Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| March 1, 1876 | 39 | After a good night's rest, the party traveled to Vienna and arrived in the evening, where friends and the chorus welcomed them warmly. The speeches for R. and for the writer were a pleasant reception, though R. ended the day exhausted. |
| March 2, 1876 | 78 | The day was filled with calls before an evening performance of Lohengrin, where R.'s conducting drew admiration and the orchestra and chorus were superb. Yet the soloists disappointed badly, leaving the writer to reflect bleakly on how hard it is to achieve anything truly elevated in established theaters; by night she felt drained and low. |
| March 3, 1876 | 113 | She began with devotional visits and social calls, then enjoyed a good dinner before leaving by train. The chorus's impromptu singing of the 'Wach' auf' chorus in the station waiting room moved her deeply, and later R. advanced the business side of the enterprise by speaking with Baron Erlanger and sending a cable to Feustel. |
| March 4, 1876 | 107 | They reached Berlin in the early afternoon after a comfortable night in the sleeping car, and Mimi was first to greet them. A letter from a watchmaker's wife, full of anxious devotion and fear for the theater's safety, touched R. greatly, and the writer thanked her on his behalf. |
| March 5, 1876 | 73 | Still without word from the children, the writer spent the day receiving visitors and making calls, while R. handled an interview about the Fiirstner affair and came back satisfied. In the evening they attended Armide, where Frau Voggenhuber seemed better than her reputation, though Herr Niemann made a poor impression. |
| March 6, 1876 | 104 | R.'s first rehearsal went fairly well, though one singer lacked the quality needed for the role. The writer admired the costumes for the king scenes but found them too visually explicit for her taste, preferring something more mystical; she spent the evening with Mimi while R. listened to a Swedish bass. |
| March 7, 1876 | 73 | A second bass singer, Herr Kogel, pleased R. and left him content from rehearsal. The day's mood changed sharply when Mimi brought a newspaper notice of the writer's mother's death, which she first could not believe; Claire still could not be reached. |
| March 8, 1876 | 84 | A delayed letter finally arrived, along with confirmation that her mother had already been buried, deepening the family's uncertainty and distance from Paris. She and R. drove to the cemetery, where the grave was well cared for, and she resolved to have it fenced in. |
| March 9, 1876 | 86 | The silence continued, interrupted only by a misplaced express letter from Philadelphia confirming R.'s terms. She wrote again in hopes of news from Paris while R. worked through rehearsals and orchestration, then they spent a quiet evening reading Saint John and the Theologia Germanica together. |
| March 10, 1876 | 88 | At last she received a funeral letter from Schure and one from Claire, though still without a usable address, so her loneliness remained unbroken. R. pushed through rehearsals and score work despite fatigue, recovering on a drive, and the evening brought Mimi's cheerful visit while the writer turned to Meister Eckhart and thoughts of Hans. |
| March 11, 1876 | 33 | R. spent the day on score work and a final staging rehearsal, though the scenery caused irritation. I occupied myself with Meister Eckhart and letters of thanks, but the message from Lulu at the boarding school cast a shadow over the day. |
| March 12, 1876 | 53 | R. managed five pages of the score after speaking with Herr Erlanger, who judged the situation risky but still salvageable. A drive together left him preferring Berlin to Vienna, and we both marveled at the immense palace built for a city so small; Mimi came by in the evening. |
| March 13, 1876 | 39 | The first orchestra rehearsal gave me a very good impression. Afterward R. and I drove to Charlottenburg, where the sight of Queen Luise suggested dignity in suffering, while he could complete only a single page of the score before Wilhelm Scholz arrived later. |
| March 14, 1876 | 37 | The second act rehearsal was marred by Niemann’s disagreeable behavior, while R. worked on his march. I received a warm letter from M. Tribert, my mother’s closest friend, and the evening brought a few visitors and some comic tales of Herr Joachim’s tyranny. |
| March 15, 1876 | 85 | Feustel’s receipt of the American remittance meant R. had to push himself even harder. The third act rehearsal only deepened my dislike of Niemann and Eckert, and I was annoyed by ticket troubles, though an amusing dream about an artistic dispute briefly lifted my mood. |
| March 16, 1876 | 248 | I did not write for several days, but the stretch was full of exertion and ceremony. After a run-through of all three acts and the successful completion of the American march, the premiere on the 20th drew the Emperor, court circles, crowds, flowers, curtain calls, and a few hostile laughs, while Betz’s Marke impressed R. greatly. |
| March 21, 1876 | 42 | R. suffered from a severe headache and kept the day quiet so he could still attend the singers’ dinner. The evening gave him a clearer grasp of Herr von Hiilsen’s character. |
| March 22, 1876 | 111 | The Emperor’s birthday arrived with heavy snow and an alarming legal warning about the 40,000 francs that might be lost because of other clauses. I struggled to protect what mattered most, while R. drew major offers for the American march and confirmation came that Tristan had been a strong success. |
| March 23, 1876 | 64 | The morning was filled with calls from important people, and Bucher joined us at breakfast before more formal visits and a farewell dinner with Mimi. She reported the Emperor’s admiration for Tristan and the Crown Princess’s serious interest in it, and I left Leipzig that night after saying goodbye to her. |
| March 24, 1876 | 16 | I returned home at one o’clock to find the children well and cheerful. The exhaustion was heavy, and I went to bed early. |
| March 25, 1876 | 54 | Business occupied the day: a letter arrived from Thomas saying the Philadelphia ladies’ committee accepted R.’s terms for the march, asking only that it be dedicated to them. M. Tribert also cabled his acceptance to represent the speaker’s interests. The evening passed quietly. |
| March 26, 1876 | 21 | Letters were written, and Eckert’s telegram brought word of the second performance’s great success. The evening turned into an argument with Herr Rubinstein. The day seems to have ended in tension despite the encouraging news. |
| March 27, 1876 | 56 | Domestic duties and the children’s lessons filled the morning. In the afternoon there was a drive to the theater, where the disorder there caused deep alarm and made readiness for the deadline seem nearly impossible. Later, reading Don Quixote offered a welcome contrast, especially the scene of Sancho’s advice about governing. |
| March 28, 1876 | 55 | Visitors came, while newspapers spread conflicting rumors about R., from a possible appointment as general musical director to claims that he was selling the theater to the Reich, and even the Faust project resurfaced. R. spoke with the mayor about the theater’s dismal condition. Against all that chaos, word also came of the second performance’s great triumph. |
| March 29, 1876 | 34 | A conference again showed machinist Brandt’s complete command of practical ideas, since he alone seemed to know how to solve the problems at hand. The ceiling can no longer be made on site and must instead be done on canvas by the next stage of work. The entry ends mid-thought, but the tone is one of technical frustration and improvisation. |
| March 30, 1876 | 21 | Loldi fell ill with a cold, so the day was divided between caring for her and managing lessons. R. was not quite well either. The household felt subdued by minor sicknesses and routine obligations. |
| March 31, 1876 | 65 | A troubling dream left R. waking in tears after imagining the writer throwing herself into the water, which stirred her own thoughts of death and longing. In the evening, Kladderadatsch provided comic pieces about Tristan und Isolde, and M. Tribert wrote very kindly about representing her interests. Even with those consolations, the day carried a heavy emotional weight. |
| No diary entries found. | ||