Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| March 2, 1874 | 138 | R. was restless and badly rested, yet kept working while the day’s spring light softened the household mood. The errands around Daniella’s schooling and the bleak talk of feuding colleagues, delay, and royal debt left both of them anxious about what lay ahead. In the evening, reading offered a brief refuge from the mounting uncertainty. |
| March 3, 1874 | 228 | The day moved between intimate talk and sharp opinions, with R. reflecting on the past through his own operas and venting political ideas in blunt, almost schematic form. Incoming telegrams and letters only deepened his irritation, especially the sense that others were being vague, patronizing, or insufficiently loyal. Even the evening reading turned combative, as he and she judged the literary world and closed with a hymn that gave the day a solemn finish. |
| March 4, 1874 | 378 | R. began the morning in a vulnerable mood, then shifted quickly into imaginative energy, sketching a bold satirical stage piece and railing against the emptiness of public life in Germany. The afternoon was quieter for her, spent with the children, while the evening revived his artistic passions through music and memory. His admiration for older works came mixed with disdain for contemporary mediocrity and the people he felt were stifling serious art. |
| March 5, 1874 | 190 | The day brought a small relief when news arrived that the King had signed the agreement, though the larger practical problems remained unresolved. R. was worn down by work and by the strain of planning, while the evening gathering stirred thoughts about performance, appearance, and the artificiality of the stage. Beneath the domestic chatter, he showed a hard moral line about loyalty and genuine feeling. |
| March 6, 1874 | 98 | Money worries pressed heavily on the household, and the conversation about the children’s future turned serious enough to justify sending the older ones to a more aristocratic institution. The day was threaded with fatigue and private concern rather than comfort. She ended by finding a rare solace in the moonlit sky, preferring that quiet beauty to human consolation. |
| March 7, 1874 | 110 | Administrative frustrations filled the day, from governess troubles to demands placed on the singers and the management’s impatience about the timetable. R. responded with long, practical letters, but his irritation was obvious, and even a sad plea for sympathy failed to move him. Their attention stayed fixed on the demands of the project and on who genuinely mattered to them. |
| March 8, 1874 | 201 | Sunday brought a blend of family routine, literary study, and renewed admiration for German drama. They compared Tieck’s criticism with the greatness of Schiller and Goethe, finding both artistic insight and unfairness in the old arguments. The evening ended on an encouraging note with telegram news that the Bayreuth benefit concert had succeeded in Vienna. |
| March 9, 1874 | 216 | R. hoped to return to his score, but the day was swallowed by practical obstacles, especially the stubborn problem of accommodations and the lack of support from local backers. The effort left him drained and discouraged, though he still managed a little progress by force of will. Their conversation drifted from philosophy to culture, with both the modern world and its institutions coming off badly. |
| March 10, 1874 | 169 | Old German myths briefly opened up a world of artistic possibility, and R. again imagined how richly they could be shaped into drama if he had the time. Most of the afternoon, however, was consumed by committee negotiations and the hard work of turning plans into reality. By the end, a capable intermediary had improved the atmosphere enough to produce agreement. |
| March 11, 1874 | 225 | The morning was full of national and cultural reflection, with R. thinking aloud about what a true German capital should represent and dismissing the Reich’s present form as hollow and militarized. Amid those larger judgments, the family’s affection for Fidi remained a bright counterweight, and even his small features became a subject of delighted scrutiny. The day closed with literary reading and talk of Tieck’s unfinished ambitions, reinforcing R.’s impatience with mediocrity and delay. |
| March 12, 1874 | 119 | R. is physically miserable yet still presses on with work, while the day is clouded by social tensions and awkward confidences that leave the writer feeling trapped between loyalty and discretion. Troubles over the fountain and the evening gathering only deepen the sense of strain, though she tries to soften the mood with conversation and a little moral encouragement. |
| March 13, 1874 | 162 | The day opens with some encouragement from R.’s account of the previous evening, but his mood quickly darkens once more as household frustrations and bad weather weigh on him. A pair of generous letters from singers lifts spirits, and the evening’s reading of Tieck brings shared delight and childhood memories of theater vividly back to life. |
| March 14, 1874 | 300 | What begins in a good-humored exchange of literary impressions turns into a day of alarm, resentment, and heavy domestic strain. News that private letters are being advertised for sale, along with fresh financial worries and the painful dismissal of a servant, leaves the writer feeling besieged, guilty, and exhausted by the harshness of events. |
| March 15, 1874 | 53 | This is a quiet family day marked by fatigue, closeness with the children, and a warm sense of domestic affection. R.’s playful gesture of identifying her with Sieglinde gives the day a tender note, though the evening musicians fail to add much pleasure. |
| March 16, 1874 | 118 | New calculations from Feustel bring another wave of discouragement, and the household feels squeezed by growing expenses and the loss of practical help. Even so, the evening reading from The Tempest offers a brief release, while the mention of Hartmann’s attack on Romeo and Juliet stirs fresh indignation. |
| March 17, 1874 | 122 | Errands, poor weather, and R.’s illness make the day laborious, and his remarks reveal a deep fatigue with his own creative past. The reports of vulgar public successes for his works only sharpen the irony, while the reading of Tieck restores some appreciation for serious criticism of the theater. |
| March 18, 1874 | 49 | Spring storms and domestic responsibilities cast a melancholy shadow over the day, though the children remain a source of comfort. In the evening, a historical-religious reading gives the pair something intellectually absorbing to share, and the Bayreuth auction plans continue in the background. |
| March 19, 1874 | 39 | The day is taken up with practical work on both sides: he revises his biography while she writes letters and manages the household. Their evening at the amateur orchestra shows R. still engaged enough to help the conductor, even if only in a modest and corrective way. |
| March 20, 1874 | 66 | Bad weather and mixed signs from afar color the day, with flowers arriving from Italy even as tension rises at home. The writer feels stung by R.’s jealousy over her French correspondence, and the evening reading of Tieck offers a more reflective end to a somewhat sad day. |
| March 21, 1874 | 114 | The household is busy but stable, with letters, visits, and work filling the day before a rewarding evening with Shakespeare. Their lively discussion of Twelfth Night turns affectionate and insightful, and the reading of Tieck reinforces their shared conviction about what makes the drama alive. |
| March 22, 1874 | 193 | The day moved between devotional routine, practical business, and a strong sense of intellectual and artistic life. After church, the family wrestled with the decision to buy the compromised letters despite the cost, then closed the evening with children, musicians, and a piano duet that stirred deep memories of Tribschen and ended in beauty. |
| March 23, 1874 | 200 | The household day was dominated by writing, legal errands, and the uneasy feeling that public and private affairs were all pressing at once. Alongside parliamentary gossip and sharp political judgments, there was a weary mood in the evening, with little pleasure in conversation and an early retreat to bed. |
| March 24, 1874 | 156 | Spring weather contrasted with R.'s continuing illness and the strain of feeling exposed to hostile talk and misuse of letters. Reports of another attack in the press, the bitterness of local Jews, and Disraeli's extravagant claims about Jewish influence all fed a sense that they were surrounded by distortion and bad faith. |
| March 25, 1874 | 172 | R. was still unwell, though he forced himself to work, while the diarist spent much of the day managing the new house and the children. The evening brought a more elevated frame of mind through Freytag's portrait of Luther, which prompted admiration for sacrifice, conviction, and the pain of choosing one duty over another. |
| March 26, 1874 | 257 | The night was marked by anxiety when R.'s foot worsened after his cold, and the day remained shadowed by medical concern and practical worry. Even so, the arrival of the Strassburg letters brought relief, and an evening spent quietly with R. helped steady the household. |
| March 28, 1874 | 122 | After another bad night, the family received the trees from Tribschen, and the gift stirred a moving sense of sacred memory and rootedness. R.'s words about the diarist's mere existence keeping him alive gave the entry a tone of fragile gratitude, despite exhaustion and eye strain. |
| March 29, 1874 | 129 | The day began with church duties and continued with R.'s work and memories of his earliest musical experiences. Conversation over the C-sharp minor Quartet turned toward his artistic origins and the ways stories and compositions blend fact, invention, and self-portraiture. |
| March 30, 1874 | 88 | A reading of Champfleury's sketch of Balzac filled the day with laughter at French wit and at the absurdities of literary and official culture. While R. worked, the pair enjoyed the comic sharpness of the scenes and the easy pleasure of shared amusement. |
| March 31, 1874 | 311 | Stormy weather kept everyone indoors while the children, house, and the Nibelungen society all demanded attention, bringing a mix of tenderness and irritation. The day also carried frustration over Brandt's delays, anger at political incompetence, and a late intellectual lift from Indian proverbs that invited reflection on humility and freedom from worldly attachments. |
| No diary entries found. | ||