Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| July 1, 1876 | 212 | The whole of Götterdämmerung was worked through, with Unger recovered but fresh trouble from Hagen, Kogel’s collapse, and Scaria’s stubbornness. Money worries were severe, the expenses overwhelming, and a solution to the Paris capital problem could not be found until news of a payment and calmer politics arrived later. The day also brought Malwida Meysenbug, a powerful piece by Nietzsche, and the shock of a sudden orchestra death, alongside outrage over the cruelty caused by the dog tax and a plan to form a rescue society. |
| July 12, 1876 | 77 | R. rehearsed with Frau Materna in the morning and then achieved an indescribable impression with the third act of Götterdämmerung in the afternoon. The evening turned sour when he erupted at the Bruckners in the restaurant after they clumsily explained why they could not neglect an old customer, and he was then ashamed of how strongly he reacted. He ended by deciding not to return there, deeply hurt by the episode. |
| July 13, 1876 | 116 | Without rehearsal, the pair still went to the theater so R. could discuss the last scene with Brandt and inspect the Doepler figurines. The diarist was distressed by their archaeological over-elaboration, finding them false to the tragic and mythical spirit and wishing for something simpler and more primitive. The evening included discussion of Glasenapp’s new biography of R., and the piano rehearsals concluded with the dismissal of Herr Rubinstein. |
| July 14, 1876 | 71 | Various annoyances crowded the day, including rudeness from the ducal palace over lodging arrangements for Frau von Schl. In the afternoon they rehearsed Rheingold, with Herr Niemann present in a mock-gracious mood, and they later stayed in the restaurant because R. wanted to invent a solution with Brandt to protect the stage effects from the orchestra’s glare. The practical concerns of staging kept intruding on the artistic work. |
| July 15, 1876 | 76 | Herr Siehr pleased R. in rehearsal and was engaged for Hagen, giving one of the day’s few satisfactions. The final rehearsal of Das Rheingold, however, was full of vexation: the rainbow bridge was wrong, the steam machinery failed, and Brandt could not produce the right vapors because of economy warnings from management. The Bruckner brothers had also painted in such haste that the decorations were permanently flawed. |
| July 16, 1876 | 41 | A letter from the King announced that he intended to come but wanted no ovation and no meeting with anyone, setting strict limits on the visit. Mimi’s arrival brought great joy, and the household spent the day together in happier spirits. There was still uncertainty about whether the German Emperor would appear. |
| July 17, 1876 | 32 | The first act of “Walküre” went badly for Frl. Scheffsky, while Herr Niemann handled his part well. Mimi was settled in and the day was spent with her, though R. was exhausted and the houses were thin. |
| July 18, 1876 | 44 | The second act only deepened the disappointment with Frl. Scheffsky, whose performance was judged intolerable. A discussion followed about replacing her at any cost, tempered by the fear that a new singer might not have time to learn the role. |
| July 19, 1876 | 32 | Most of the day was devoted to Mimi, giving the entry a quieter family focus. In the evening, the third act of “Walküre” made a strong impression, especially Brandt’s “Magic Fire,” though Doepler’s Valkyries were disappointing. |
| July 20, 1876 | 41 | The first act of “Siegfried” brought a solid showing from Herr Unger, despite weak support from the rest of the company. Herr Schlosser was a problem, having lost much of Mime after singing a variety of other roles in Munich. |
| July 21, 1876 | 99 | Box office receipts were encouraging, and the final scene of “Götterdämmerung” was taking shape in a more human form. A gracious telegram from the King arrived, but R. remained worn down and could barely sleep past dawn. |
| July 22, 1876 | 114 | A rumor suggested Hans might come, adding a hopeful note to the day. The rehearsal of the third act of “Siegfried” went splendidly, and the evening ended with Lusch’s arrival, R.’s tender mood, and his reflections on death and gratitude. |
| July 23, 1876 | 46 | Lusch’s growth and resemblance to her father delighted everyone, and the day was otherwise occupied with ordinary errands. That mood was interrupted by serious anger when the management committee advertised a public rehearsal without telling R. |
| July 24, 1876 | 64 | The quick sale of seats pleased Feustel, and R. responded by gathering a lively lunch table with Feustel, Gross, Nietzsche, the Dannreuthers, and others. The first act of “Götterdämmerung” was heard with the children and Princess Barjatinsky, followed by supper with the children. |
| July 25, 1876 | 84 | The day mixed social warmth with theatrical strain, beginning with dinner among Princess B., Mimi, Count Wallis, and Wilhelmj. In the public second act, Siehr impressed as Hagen, but the evening ended in friction when Brandt took offense at being listed merely as a machinist. |
| July 26, 1876 | 71 | R. quarreled over the committee’s complaint that he had admitted the fire brigade to rehearsal for free, but the matter was defused through joking and Heckel’s mediation. By evening, after the third act and a long restaurant stay with Mimi and Princess B., the growing sense of the production’s shortcomings became hard to ignore. |
| July 27, 1876 | 77 | Word came that Herr von Baligand had quarrelled with the committee and walked out, leaving everyone to wonder who would now prepare the palace for the princely guests. The day felt clogged with absurdities, and the costume rehearsal only deepened the irritation with its conventional, overdone lack of beauty. Amid it all, R. was again admired for his patience and kindness, while trouble with the servants at home added one more burden. |
| July 28, 1876 | 124 | R. had a poor night but stayed in a cheerful and friendly mood, and a pleasant lunch with the Wilhelmjes briefly lightened the day. At rehearsal, Professor Doepler reacted badly when asked for modest costume changes, revealing himself as a crude hack and exposing the costumes as provincially tasteless. The whole affair was especially vexing because Wotan’s hat remained an impossible embarrassment, more musketeer than god. |
| July 29, 1876 | 71 | R. spent the day at the theater, where Doepler behaved like an overgrown schoolboy, and the evening brought the first costume performance of Rheingold. The singers were strong, especially Vogl as Loge, yet the mood afterward was bleak because Herr Brandt had made an error and R. took it deeply to heart. Even the King’s question about the scenery could not ease the worry hanging over the night. |
| July 30, 1876 | 39 | R. went straight to the theater in the morning while the writer made various calls, keeping the day in motion but not especially lively. Later there was a dinner with Herr and Frau v. Schl., followed by a garden party at the Feustels’ with Bayreuth people and the artists. It was a socially full day, more communal than reflective. |
| July 31, 1876 | 67 | The morning was spent fetching Princess Barjatinsky and Niemann’s little daughter, which sharpened the writer’s sense of the ugly talk and opinions circulating everywhere. What disturbed her most was the falseness beneath all that chatter, leaving her wishing for night and an end to it all. In the evening she went to WalMre and a rehearsal of the entr’actes. |
| No diary entries found. | ||