Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| January 1, 1876 | 188 | The year begins with church, visitors, and immediate irritation over false newspaper reports about Scaria and the Bayreuth committee. Wagner is deeply discouraged by the smear campaign around him and the house-sale rumors, while the evening closes gloomily with paperwork and the upkeep payment for a brother’s grave in Berlin. |
| January 2, 1876 | 121 | Bayreuth friends come to lunch, and Wagner publicly turns the moment into an expression of gratitude for the people who have sustained him through the past year. Later, more distorted newspaper attacks surface, but the day ends in relief and uplift as they read the first act of 'Romeo and Juliet' and feel momentarily transported. |
| January 3, 1876 | 250 | The day is haunted by memory, with Wagner dreaming of country walks and the old sounds of Tribschen still ringing in the ears. The diary returns again to hostile press lies, and the sense of injustice is sharpened by reports of caricatures and insults, though the evening reading of 'The Merchant of Venice' offers some respite. |
| January 4, 1876 | 238 | Worries dominate from morning to night as the year’s balance sheet is weighed against a long list of disappointments: critics, officials, Vienna, Scaria, and the threatening Frau K. König. Financial strain deepens when a promised advance fails to arrive, yet Shakespeare’s comedy is again used as a needed counterweight to the misery. |
| January 5, 1876 | 241 | Nothing reassuring arrives, and Wagner is visibly shaken by the silence. Feustel discusses finances, Brussels is considered as a possible concert destination, and money is even sent to Kinowsky despite all the family complications, while plans for the Bayreuth undertaking remain fragile and uncertain. |
| January 6, 1876 | 231 | Wagner’s dream of conducting the Ninth Symphony becomes a nightmare of humiliation, hunger, and obstruction, mirroring the frustrations of waking life. The day brings more disappointments over money and support, and even the reading choices fail to lift the mood. |
| January 7, 1876 | 44 | Daniella leaves, and the departure feels like the hardest trial the diarist has yet faced. The day is uniformly gray, marked by longing for Wagner to return to work and by a general sense of heaviness. |
| January 8, 1876 | 128 | Hans’s birthday becomes an inward, disciplined day of fasting, prayer, and a vow to accept hardship more serenely. Artistic work on the Gibichung hall curtain provides some consolation, and Wagner’s storytelling from Arab history brings a gentler atmosphere before sleep. |
| January 9, 1876 | 120 | A troubled dream about spoiling a score reflects Wagner’s strained state of mind, and the day begins with children, ice, and anxious news about Unger and political maneuvering. Though the situation seems desperate, there is at least a promise to resume the biography, even if obstacles loom everywhere. |
| January 10, 1876 | 68 | The household is busy from early lessons through afternoon ice skating and evening work with the children. Wagner meets resistance from the mayor over a petition to the Reichstag, prompting more correspondence about whether the matter would be taken badly, and the night ends with scenes from 'Hamlet'. |
| January 11, 1876 | 68 | The day carried the same subdued rhythm as the one before, with memories of the past rising up in a melancholy but oddly pleasant way, as if the sister’s presence still lingered between them. A letter from nephew Jachmann brought news about the Fiirstner affair, and R. considered a trip to Berlin. In the evening Marke’s mournful howl startled everyone, leaving a strong impression. |
| January 12, 1876 | 113 | There was no dictation today, and R. was absorbed by business troubles, especially his irritation at being sent to the Reichstag after appealing to the Emperor’s grace. Conversation after lunch turned to Tannhduser and the long chain of hardships attached to the work’s fate. The evening ended in a bleak mood, deepened by the note about Pusinelli’s unpaid debt and the duty to make amends to his heirs. |
| January 13, 1876 | 33 | The day was full of ordinary work and family activity: time with Boni, dictation, and then skating with the children. Later there was more work with Boni and the little ones before evening reading with R. from Gibbon on Mohammed. The tone is busy and domestic rather than strained. |
| January 14, 1876 | 122 | Letters dominated the day, including a good report from Standhartner, a kind message from the King, and a gloomy one from Councilor Dufflipp about the royal treasury. R. sent a telegram after deciding not to press the matter further, having learned that the emergency was less severe than feared and that a rebuff from the Reichstag would damage the whole undertaking. The evening closed with Doughty’s history of the Arabs and R.’s remark that they felt less congenial to him than Christian heroes. |
| January 15, 1876 | 98 | R. discovered another contract swindle: in the Vienna agreement, the subscription income had been omitted, which could cut deeply into his royalties if the theater prospered. The injury stung all the more because he had trusted that the Berlin terms would be carried over correctly in writing. Work with the children continued, and R. wrote to Herr Jauner to complain. |
| January 16, 1876 | 46 | Jachmann reported that R.’s presence was not absolutely necessary, while the family celebrated Rubinstein’s return from Berlin. In the evening Rubinstein played several pieces, including Mihalovich’s Hero and Leander. The music showed talent, but it also left them uneasy. |
| January 17, 1876 | 149 | R. had a musical insight in the evening, noting that a countertheme could be found by reversing a theme and comparing melodic relations to visual spectra. The day also brought dictation and visits, but the main practical concern was political: Feustel’s letter and Bismarck’s secretary both suggested approaching the Reichstag and the Prince directly. R. resisted firmly, insisting he would appeal to the Emperor and the Reich Chancellor, not to the Reichstag’s opinion. |
| January 18, 1876 | 79 | The King sent a life-size photograph, and Dr. Strecker visited with the score of Siegfried, making a very good impression. Dictation and work with Boni filled the day, and in the evening they began reading Lagarde’s pamphlet On the Present State of the German Reich. It contained useful ideas, especially on Austria and education, though its theology struck them as muddled. |
| January 19, 1876 | 118 | Dictation and work continued, but the atmosphere darkened as royalties arrived and the finances were tallied, confirming the theater’s disastrous condition. Baron Hofmann reported poor attendance, and R. said that only a man like Bismarck could help, which only proved how badly things stood. Jauner’s cable about Scaria’s demands angered R. so much that he nearly wanted to drop him at once, though he first sought Betz and Niemann’s opinion. |
| January 20, 1876 | 50 | More dictation and lessons were followed by Betz’s view that Scaria should indeed be dismissed, and R. wrote accordingly to Jauner. The question now turned to how Frau Materna would respond. The day was further unsettled by a changed lunch hour, friction between the governess and parlormaid, and trouble with the writer’s eyes. |
| January 21, 1876 | 61 | The day was spent in lessons and dictation, with a birthday greeting sent to Feustel. In the evening they kept reading Lagarde’s pamphlet and found it full of worthwhile ideas, which deepened their growing interest in education and the possibility of founding a model school with Nietzsche, Rohde, Overbeck, and Lagarde, perhaps under the King’s patronage. |
| January 22, 1876 | 58 | The routine continued, while R. remained absorbed in the Arabs through Baron Schack’s work. The evening was devoted to Shakespeare’s Richard II, which struck them as endlessly revealing and provoked repeated admiration and discussion. |
| January 23, 1876 | 20 | After dictation and a walk, the evening brought visitors, a Haydn symphony, and Rubinstein’s newest piece from Der Ring des Nibelungen. The day closed in a social and musical mood. |
| January 24, 1876 | 39 | It was another day of lessons and dictation, though I also had many business matters to settle. In the evening they finished Richard II, and its effect was so strong that sleep was lost over it. |
| January 25, 1876 | 47 | The day felt tiring, and I had already written to Bucher to explain why we had not approached the Reichstag and to ask that no official notice reach us before the Berlin visit in March. In the evening they turned to Henry IV. |
| January 26, 1876 | 40 | R. was not fully well and was annoyed by Betz’s letter, while Fricke was being recommended for Hagen. The evening ended more pleasantly with a ball at the district president’s house and a private, affectionate hour together on the way home. |
| January 27, 1876 | 21 | R. spent the day writing to the King while I handled lessons and other business. They relaxed in the evening with Don Quixote. |
| January 28, 1876 | 84 | Dictation continued, though my eyes were troubling me. Letters and newspaper talk brought warnings about the risks of openly attacking the press for R.’s sake, while a reported satire by Bauernfeld and its favorable notice in Leipzig added to the sense of hostility. |
| January 29, 1876 | 49 | Lessons and dictation filled the day, and we visited the unfortunate but dear Schenk. R. was in a bad mood, and Bucher’s letter urged complete caution, noting that only the Prince could be trusted and that he was ill; the evening again ended with Don Quixote. |
| January 30, 1876 | 25 | It was a day for correspondence, with the children enjoying a holiday, and I also wrote to R. Liechtenstein. The evening brought the Bayreuth circle together, now enlivened by Frau von Staff. |
| January 31, 1876 | 123 | The day was taken up with the children and dictation, while R. came back from a conference deeply discouraged by the state of the enterprise. Attendance was far too low, expenses kept rising, and the press remained hostile even to simple announcements. News from Paris and America only widened the sense that public slander was spreading against him everywhere. |
| No diary entries found. | ||