Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| February 1, 1876 | 54 | A small dinner gathered Staffs, Kiinsberg, and others, and afterward R. tried to skate but found he could no longer manage it. The evening offered little besides Don Quixote, which had become their main consolation. Even so, his mind kept drifting back to future music, with Varyival and Gurnemanz lingering in his thoughts. |
| February 2, 1876 | 52 | Candlemas brought little brightness outside, and the writer felt an inward hunger for peace. R. allowed himself a fragile hope that the performances might eventually awaken shame and then a better new beginning. The evening reception from local patrons, however, felt like a strain rather than encouragement. |
| February 3, 1876 | 60 | R. devoted himself to arranging Herr Unger’s Vienna debut, hoping to have him sing the third-act Siegfried scene with Frau Materna. At the same time, reports from Vienna were discouraging, since the subscription proceeds were not expected to yield royalty payments. Lunch with Frau v. Staff and Frau v. Kiinsberg was pleasant enough, and the evening again ended with Don Quixote. |
| February 4, 1876 | 93 | Dictation was overshadowed by deep melancholy, with Siegfried providing almost the only relief. R. walked up to the theater and found the place nearly empty, while even the practical arrangements for lodging were being handled uncertainly because no one knew who would come. An English lady’s thoughtful Schopenhauer biography offered some comfort before the evening returned to Don Quixote. |
| February 5, 1876 | 68 | R. admitted that if the trip to Berlin were not so near, he would have started work on Parsifal instead. He met with the management committee and told them they were all playing a gamble, though they still kept their confidence. The night, as usual, closed with Don Quixote. |
| February 6, 1876 | 98 | Snow fell, and R. remarked on winter turning white in old age, but he himself was burdened by a headache. I spent the day writing letters, including one about a possible Tristan performance in support of the theater, while R. found his only pleasure in walking the dogs. Rumors about Hans in Meiningen tempted me with hope, yet my mood sank further into melancholy. |
| February 7, 1876 | 222 | R. woke in high spirits after a vivid dream about conducting a festival from a neighboring room, only to be outraged in the dream by an inserted ballet. He also received good news from Madrid about Faens(i), though the larger situation remained chaotic and comic, including the strange appearance of a bailiff. The mystery resolved into a claim against Scaria’s earnings, which at least explained his bizarre conduct, and the evening again ended with Don Quixote. |
| February 8, 1876 | 60 | The children’s lessons and dictation went so well that R. compared the work on the Fife to a house on fire. Later an amateur concert included Mendelssohn’s Reformation Symphony, and the second movement prompted his sharp joke about Tetzel and money. The music drew him into reflection even as the day remained full of labor. |
| February 9, 1876 | 144 | R. spent the day composing a piece for the Americans for the opening of the World’s Fair and the Centennial of Independence, asking for a sizable fee and wondering whether anyone would pay it. He struggled to find music that could express American grandeur, settling for a gentle rocking idea instead. The evening brought a sleigh ride, Beethoven trios, and admiration for a new viola type that he wanted for his orchestra, though he was worn out by the end. |
| February 10, 1876 | 51 | R. spent the day at his composition while I kept busy with the children, and Boni proved steady, helpful, and friendly. The evening ended with Don Quixote, and there was some encouraging news as the Weser-Zeitung editor offered to champion R. while Standhartner reported that Lohengrin could only be staged in Vienna on March 2. |
| February 11, 1876 | 32 | R. worked all morning and afternoon on the new piece and remarked that it was the first time he had ever written for money. We took our comfort in the evening with Don Quixote. |
| February 12, 1876 | 22 | I taught while R. composed, though he did so without any real pleasure. The day closed quietly with reading, and the management committee’s quarterly report was sent on to the patrons. |
| February 13, 1876 | 36 | The children played while I spent the day writing letters, and I was touched by the English lady who sent us an excellent biography of Schopenhauer. I also wrote to R. Liechtenstein and Marie Donhoff, keeping up a wide circle of correspondence. |
| February 14, 1876 | 142 | R. struggled with his composition and complained that he could not picture anything for it, only the uncertain 5,000 dollars he had asked for. An evening conference brought a strong article defending him, though Bismarck’s reported coldness over our failure to follow his advice cast a shadow over matters. |
| February 15, 1876 | 140 | A thaw left R. uneasy, yet he still worked through both morning and afternoon. The editor of the Weser-Zeitung confessed to writing the Frankfurter article, an Italian visitor was reassured about the performances, and a poor teacher, after seeing the scores, resolved to attend them at all costs. Don Quixote in the evening led us into thoughts about Cervantes’ growing artistry. |
| February 16, 1876 | 133 | I labored over lessons, while R. received reassuring news that Tristan could not be given before March 15, which he accepted. He showed me an “American” album leaf and the women’s chorus for Parzival, then the children celebrated Eva early and I wrote a birthday note to Marie Hohenlohe before we ended with Don Quixote and the lions episode. |
| February 17, 1876 | 103 | R. was under severe pressure with his composition, though we still celebrated Evchen merrily. He studied Handel and found much of it shallow, while a letter from Countess Danckelmann left us anxious that the housing arrangements might turn disastrous. |
| February 18, 1876 | 71 | Spring arrived with the starlings, but R. felt ill and overburdened by Tristan in Berlin, the court cases, the lodging difficulties, Lohengrin in Vienna, and the American piece due by March 15. He was too exhausted even to read to me in the evening, and the question of whether the promised 5,000 dollars would ever come hung over everything. |
| February 19, 1876 | 81 | R. worked while I gave lessons, and a cable from Niemann asking for the love song parts suggested some renewed contact after the return of Siegmund. In the evening we listened to a little Don Quixote, especially the puppet-theater scene, and admired it again despite wondering how many people truly understood it. |
| February 20, 1876 | 34 | A quiet Sunday becomes a happy one: after the day’s letters, R. finishes his draft and plays it through, which brings them real delight. In the evening they see some local acquaintances. |
| February 21, 1876 | 78 | Between lessons, the writer is absorbed in arrangements for R.'s birthday while R. is upset by Jauner’s telegram about the financial terms for the performance of Fohen^rin. The evening is taken up with practical discussions about apartments and cloakroom details, though the household itself remains calm apart from Brandt’s anxiety. |
| February 22, 1876 | 113 | R. writes to Jauner to ask whether the performance might be delayed, since conditions have worsened further. The entry turns outward to a bleak view of Germany’s economic misery and industrial stagnation, then closes with an evening spent over Bon Quixote. |
| February 23, 1876 | 95 | The day brings troublesome correspondence from Aachen, whose committee makes awkward demands about using Vogl in June, while Vienna also seems increasingly unlikely. R. starts orchestrating the march only to rewrite the opening pages, and the strain is sharpened by exhausted funds and his rheumatic hand, though spring is near and Bon Quixote still fills the evening. |
| February 24, 1876 | 165 | R. sleeps better after deciding against Vienna, but the Jauner telegrams soon revive the uncertainty and lead him to suggest postponing the Lohengrin performance until fall. The rest of the day is split between orchestration, childcare, Hans’s letter from America, and a deep private grief that the writer keeps mostly unspoken. |
| February 25, 1876 | 81 | Another restless night leaves R. cautious and unwilling to press ahead until he hears more, though a later telegram from Jauner finally settles the Vienna trip. An American tuner comes to inspect the Steinway in the evening, and Don Quixote is beginning to lose its charm. |
| February 26, 1876 | 54 | News arrives that the Emperor has ordered Tristan for the theater’s benefit, but R. is not pleased because the honor will cost him royalties and bring little practical help. He works while the writer teaches and prepares for travel, and the evening passes in conversation. |
| February 27, 1876 | 225 | R. has a poor night and reads encouraging criticism of Gotterddmmerung, but his health and the burden of the Sunday reception weigh on him. The writer then composes a long report to Hans about their artistic situation, reflecting intensely on suffering as something almost sacred and even blessing-like. |
| February 28, 1876 | 53 | Brange’s illness and the death of her three puppies provoke pity, especially beside human dissatisfaction and complaint. R.’s little joke about it draws laughter, yet the mood remains strained as departure preparations continue. |
| February 29, 1876 | 84 | They leave at half past one in good spirits, with mild weather softening the journey, though in Eger they discover there is no onward connection and must stay overnight. Rather than sulk, they laugh about it and spend the time talking about Arabs and Beethoven’s Scherzo. |
| No diary entries found. | ||