Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1876 | 24 | The machine rehearsals continue, and R. astonishes everyone by acting, climbing, and demonstrating each effect himself. Herr Hill’s arrival is especially heartening, adding energy and confidence to the work. |
| June 2, 1876 | 40 | The Alberich-and-Mime rehearsal proceeds well, and the evening brings a further victory when Hill insists on climbing into the abyss despite his own misgivings. R. can savor the result as another proof that the production is taking shape against the odds. |
| June 3, 1876 | 79 | The first orchestral rehearsal sounds magnificent, and by nightfall R. is overjoyed that the whole experiment has worked. The Rhinemaidens themselves mount the machines, Hill performs his own climbing, and the impossible suddenly seems real, while I am left in deep melancholy and tears. |
| June 4, 1876 | 18 | Whitsunday brings more arrivals, extending the sense that the company is steadily gathering. The day closes with another hearing of the orchestra and the sight of the Rhinemaidens swimming, adding to the festive, uncanny atmosphere. |
| June 5, 1876 | 39 | A second artists’ dinner at our house is cheerful, with Betz, Wilhelmj, and others enlivening the gathering. After inspecting Grane, we return to the Rheingold rehearsal, where the first scene with orchestra and singers feels almost unbelievable in its reality, especially with the children present. |
| June 6, 1876 | 121 | Fidi’s seventh birthday is marked by a lovely surprise: R. wakes me with the Idyll and brings the child to my bed while the music is still being heard. The players salute Fidi in the gallery, and he thanks them shyly; even a stork circling the house feels like a lucky sign. By evening, though, R. is exhausted by rehearsals and irritated by delays, especially the unfinished decorations from the Bruckner brothers. |
| June 7, 1876 | 84 | R. gets through the night reasonably well, but the constant rehearsing weighs heavily on him, and I attend one myself to see the remarkable progress, especially Brandt’s work. Back home, I find a sentimental letter from conductor Wiillner in Munich, who explains his old hostility to Wagner while still trying to hold on to control of the Ring performances. |
| June 8, 1876 | 22 | The rehearsals continue from morning into late afternoon, and I am increasingly anxious watching the strain on R. and everyone around him. Domestic concerns pile on top of the artistic pressure, leaving the day feeling overfull and unsettled. |
| June 9, 1876 | 75 | The staging rehearsal for the closing scene of Das Rheingold already makes a strong impression, and the atmosphere among the musicians seems almost electrified. Richter later reports that after the orchestra’s final rehearsal they broke into cheers, while R. comes back early from the piano rehearsal delighted with how well it has gone. |
| June 11, 1876 | 81 | A letter from Councilor Duffiipp brings news that the King is offended by R.’s failure to thank him for his birthday telegram, adding court irritation to the mounting tension. The final Rheingold rehearsal goes splendidly, with the children present and the arrivals of Materna and Niemann adding to the excitement, while I privately enjoy seeing Richter, once rejected in Munich, tasked with ushering Count Castell into the theater. |
| June 12, 1876 | 54 | R. is afflicted with headache and a gum boil, yet after leeching he still insists on driving to rehearsal and even writes to the King in the middle of the pain. Afterward he is quite unwell, though he continues drilling the cast of Walkiire with relentless precision, down to every gesture and word. |
| June 13, 1876 | 94 | R. has a dreadful night as a gum abscess develops, forcing him to miss rehearsal entirely while Niemann, Fricke, and Richter take over. Feustel sends a discouraging report on ticket sales, and the numbers already look worrisome, casting a shadow over the enterprise and reminding me how fragile everything is. |
| June 14, 1876 | 61 | R. is still too ill to lead the rehearsal, and I go to the theater myself to bring him what good news I can. Even in pain he jokes that it is almost his fate to have Die Walkiire performed behind his back, while I am preoccupied by worries about the governess. |
| June 15, 1876 | 123 | His condition worsens, and once again he cannot attend rehearsal, so the second act proceeds without him to little effect. Feustel presses me about supporting the project with my expected inheritance, and I immediately write to Claire and begin thinking how to secure the money, while he remains doubtful that enough funds will ever come through. |
| June 16, 1876 | 104 | With chloral, R. manages a tolerable night, though he feels puffed up and miserable, and his absence turns rehearsal into a struggle in the dark. When I tell him of Feustel’s financial fears, he puts the artistic goal first and speaks of turning to the Reichstag and the princes if a deficit remains, even proposing Bismarck as an honorary patron. |
| June 17, 1876 | 71 | With chloral helping him sleep again, R. takes charge of the rehearsal and finds the cast and orchestra transformed by the new circumstances. The Eckerts and niece Johanna come from Berlin, and he decides the horse should be removed from the Brünnhilde-Siegmund scene because it distracts from the drama. Feustel reports that the Crown Prince and Princess have declined invitations to the performances. |
| June 18, 1876 | 43 | The household keeps the Sabbath quietly, though the narrator is busy moving back and forth on errands. A letter from Countess Vitzthum brings welcome news about Lulu’s progress, and another message arrives from a Russian in Podolia requesting patronage. The day feels light in public matters but still full of small obligations. |
| June 19, 1876 | 25 | News comes of August Rockel’s death, and the loss is felt more as a painful separation in life than as grief over death itself. The entry carries a subdued, reflective sadness rather than dramatic lament. The emotional emphasis falls on absence and distance. |
| June 20, 1876 | 216 | Though still unwell, R. accompanies the writer to rehearsal and has to explain everything to the musicians himself. The second rehearsal of the third act of Walküre is overwhelming, especially when he demonstrates Scheffsky’s change from despair to exaltation and leaves everyone in tears. The evening mixes admiration, practical business letters, and anxiety over Batz’s continuing insolence. |
| June 21, 1876 | 39 | The third Walküre rehearsal becomes a source of irritation, with the orchestra struggling to keep proper tempi and Scheffsky nearly impossible. Retreating upstairs, the narrator and R. talk, and the conversation seems to lift his spirits somewhat. Even so, the day is shadowed by frustration and by plans concerning Scheffsky. |
| June 22, 1876 | 43 | The first piano rehearsal of Siegfried begins well, and Unger earns R.’s approval as the only singer who has really learned from him. Visitors arrive in the form of Countess Usedom and her daughter, adding a social note to the day. In the evening the two of them stay in the restaurant together. |
| June 23, 1876 | 89 | R. remains exhausted and is troubled by his failing memory for names, unable even to recall Wilhelmj when he needs to. After overseeing the orchestra rehearsal and attending the second Siegfried piano rehearsal, he is annoyed by the conductors’ unflattering remarks about Unger. The narrator entertains the Countesses Usedom at home before R. joins them later. |
| June 24, 1876 | 78 | R. is still severely run down and beset by the abscess, yet he goes on to the orchestra rehearsal anyway. Doepler takes offense at R.’s insistence that too much is still missing, but R. later smooths matters over in his usual gracious way. The day ends socially in the restaurant, and a planned American march rehearsal is abandoned because the players have gone off to Berneck. |
| June 25, 1876 | 62 | Herr Kogel finally sings Hagen before R., an important test after much anticipation. The children’s preference for the first act of Siegfried delights R., since he sees their response as proof of the work’s folk character rather than its supposed obscurity. The day closes with lunch guests and an evening reception. |
| June 26, 1876 | 84 | The first rehearsal of Siegfried’s second act is emotionally mixed: Unger is hoarse, which causes real concern, yet the act itself makes a splendid impression. R. returns home sad because the scenery does not match his vision, but Brandt repairs the situation astonishingly quickly. That rescue restores a cheerful mood by evening. |
| June 27, 1876 | 45 | The second act of the work was again hampered by Herr Unger’s hoarseness, which weakened its effect considerably. By evening both R. and the diarist were worn out, and the day was further troubled by difficulty with Herr Kogel and the choice of Gura for Donner. Reports from Turkey added a dark political note to the atmosphere. |
| June 28, 1876 | 56 | With no governess yet engaged, the children’s unusually good behavior became a source of amusement, as they educated one another like little Pestalozzis. R. endured a taxing rehearsal with Herr Kogel, then the evening brought the second act of Siegfried with orchestra, which was splendid despite Unger still being hoarse. R. also suffered unsettling dreams about the diarist. |
| June 29, 1876 | 103 | The third act of Siegfried demanded exhausting preparation from R., and the day was burdened by a discouraging rehearsal with Herr Kogel, repeated problems with the orchestra, and Unger’s continuing hoarseness. Financial strain and bad news from London and the war made the situation feel precarious, with each day costing thousands of marks. Still, there was real pleasure in Herr v. Hagen’s article on the first scene of Das Rheingold. |
| June 30, 1876 | 62 | A promise from Councilor DiffHipp offered some delay, though R. was beside himself over the situation. The arrival of the English governess was a relief after the unpleasant German candidates, and the evening performance of Siegfried made a magnificent impression even with Unger still hoarse. The diarist reflects on the enormous distance between the work, its performers, and the audience, while R. ends the day exhausted. |
| No diary entries found. | ||