Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| September 1, 1876 | 32 | More departures followed, and I dined with the Schleinitzes, Malwida, and other friends. In the evening my father played Opus 106 for a tiny group, and it sounded extraordinarily beautiful. |
| September 2, 1876 | 29 | My father left today, closing a heartfelt stretch of visits. The final evening was lively and companionable, though music was absent, and the King even asked whether a fourth cycle might be possible. |
| September 3, 1876 | 44 | Only R. Liechtenstein, Malwida, and Gersdorff remained, so the day was spent quietly over lunch and in the evening with a much smaller circle. R.'s meeting with the management committee eased concerns about money, and a repeat performance next year now seemed likely. |
| September 4, 1876 | 38 | With the final departure, they held their first family lunch, but exhaustion overtook me and I had to lie down. The weather was splendid, which stood in sharp contrast to the miserable days that followed the last cycle, even though the performances themselves had enjoyed kind conditions. |
| September 7, 1876 | 65 | Business matters and travel plans filled the day, with R. intent on taking everything to Italy and letters piling up around them. We also settled on a larger purpose for the coming years: to devote our strength and means to educating children, building a school, and preparing six boys with Fidi, an idea that delighted me deeply. |
| September 8, 1876 | 57 | The copyists came for lunch, marking the last meal together, and the mood was heavy with melancholy. Hard judgments were voiced about Herr Brandt's rudeness and ingratitude toward R., and although R. tried to defend him, the effort only left him more wounded and sad. |
| September 9, 1876 | 181 | Math. Maier departed, the final guest, and the rest of the day was consumed by packing and plans for the journey. In a long evening talk about the performances, R. grew sharply critical of several singers and of the length of Götterdämmerung, and his disappointment ran so deep that he spoke as if he wished to die. |
| September 14, 1876 | 44 | Most of the day went into travel preparations before we left at one o'clock, with the children crying over the dogs they had to leave behind. We reached Munich by evening, where a rude waiter, rain, and a small disaster with my burning neckerchief made the arrival even more chaotic. |
| September 15, 1876 | 61 | Crossing the Brenner brought a rush of gratitude and memory, as the mountains seemed to greet us and I kept thinking of the farewell in Munich and the night journey with Isolde and Eva in my arms. By late morning we arrived in Verona, where confusion at the hotel and much laughter ended only when we finally went to bed. |
| September 16, 1876 | 78 | The morning was given over to Verona's squares, the arena, and a leisurely breakfast by the Adige, before I wandered on alone and was especially moved by San Zeno, San Fermo, and the city's overall charm. The evening at the Teatro Ristori was a disappointment, as the Otello performance was very poor. |
| September 17, 1876 | 150 | I spent a long day touring churches, museums, and streets with the children, finding real beauty in a few paintings and in places like San Fermo and San Zeno, though much of the Renaissance copying left me cold. The children stayed lively, but R. was unwell, and I remained with him in the evening after declining Countess Pianell's invitation. |
| September 18, 1876 | 65 | R. had a miserable night but felt somewhat better by morning, while I took the children out to more churches and then to Madonna di Campagna, revisiting Santa Maria in Organo with pleasure. In the afternoon we drove to the Collina Massimo and came home after sunset. |
| September 19, 1876 | 80 | The trip to Venice began with an immediate sense of delight: the city’s first sights, the hotel, and the walk through San Marco all made a strong impression. The evening was crowned by workers from the dockyard singing for them, and the music struck the writer as a direct expression of the people’s soul. |
| September 20, 1876 | 50 | A visit to San Marco left mixed feelings, with the grandeur seeming almost excessive and San Zeno feeling more like home. The day also brought a meeting with Tesarini, remembered warmly as an early Wagnerian Venetian, and the evening was spent on the Piazza San Marco. |
| September 21, 1876 | 65 | Rain kept them wandering through Venice under a duller mood, with a stop at an antique shop and concern for R., whose health was not good in the climate. In the evening they went to a theater production that showed more talent than Wilbrandt’s version, though it felt mannered, and later they visited Palazzo Giustiniani. |
| September 22, 1876 | 41 | The day opened with meeting Countess Luise Voss and exploring the Doge’s Palace with her, which felt overwhelming in its richness and beauty. After a trip to the Lido, the evening ended with a play that left little enjoyment. |
| September 23, 1876 | 160 | A gratifying letter from the King confirmed that Bayreuth’s meaning had been understood, though this was shadowed by Feustel’s alarming news of heavy debts. Alone at the Academy of Fine Arts, the writer was deeply shaken by the paintings and galleries, then later enjoyed a ride along the canals while R. remained ill. |
| September 24, 1876 | 86 | At Santa Maria dei Frari, the art and monuments prompted reflection on the differences between Renaissance sculpture and that of the eighteenth century. The day continued with a drive to the Giardino Papadopoli and an evening visit with Countess Voss, though R. was still unwell. |
| September 25, 1876 | 123 | The morning was spent moving from San Giovanni e Paolo to its adjoining hospital, where the sight of the sick in such beautiful surroundings left the writer unusually moved. Later visits to the Gesuiti and other churches brought intense pleasure in the paintings, while the children’s walks through the city were a bright counterpoint to the poverty in the streets. |
| September 26, 1876 | 129 | The final morning in Venice was devoted to the Accademia, and leaving the city felt painfully difficult, as though parting from something almost beyond human companionship. Bologna received them with a gloomy first impression, and the writer ended the day sadly transcribing the fleeting Venetian days. |
| September 27, 1876 | 72 | After driving through Bologna and visiting sites outside the city, they met the syndic Count Tacconi, whose graciousness toward R. made a good impression. The city itself seemed broad, solid, and horizontally spread out, and the evening was spent indoors. |
| September 28, 1876 | 197 | A long day of museums, churches, and palaces gave fresh admiration for Francia and a more measured view of Domenichino and Carracci, with special pleasure in a Madonna by Cima. The writer then launched into a reflection on the limits of painting and the need for speech in art, before a punishingly hot journey took them to Naples late at night, with the children still good-natured despite the ordeal. |
| September 30, 1876 | 28 | The day was given over to rest, with only a short walk, an afternoon nap, and some reading of Sismondi. In the evening there was a sea excursion and a drive along the Chiaia. |
| No diary entries found. | ||