Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| February 1, 1874 | 148 | She welcomes the end of a painful month with the hope that a new one may bring relief, even while knowing that some forms of sorrow simply do not change with time. The day circles around the limits of representation as they visit the photographer, compare photography to science and painting to philosophy, and end in cold weather, a short walk, and a thoughtful reading on the Greeks. |
| February 2, 1874 | 74 | The day moves between practical household changes and a sense that the larger project may be turning a corner: a letter to the King is being prepared, and a new servant family arrives from Berlin. In the evening, the mood softens into intellectual pleasure as the old Gibbon is taken up again with genuine delight. |
| February 3, 1874 | 150 | The new house and the newly arrived household are checked on, while R. finishes his letter to the King and gathers the evening copyists around music. The session becomes a lesson in listening, with Haydn and Weber treated as examples of clarity, force, and tonal brilliance, before a bizarre exchange with a Macedonian visitor adds an odd comic note. |
| February 4, 1874 | 111 | News that Schott may be interested in the proposal offers a brief opening, but the day is otherwise shadowed by delay and tension around the King’s response and the looming public consequences. Her failing eyes and growing isolation deepen the gloom, and she ends the day feeling unable to speak or move outward into the world. |
| February 5, 1874 | 241 | R.’s temper flares over a rights dispute, and she has to steady him after what feels like another example of petty opportunism. Later, more discouraging replies arrive from potential supporters of the guarantee fund, though the couple forces themselves to laugh and keep going despite the bad prospects and her inability to read. |
| February 6, 1874 | 49 | With her eyes still too weak for work, the evening reading becomes his responsibility, and even their reflections on Roman heroism carry a bitter political edge. The mention that preparations for `Rienzi` are underway in Venice keeps the broader artistic world in view, but the atmosphere remains constrained by illness and fatigue. |
| February 7, 1874 | 90 | A springlike walk with the children and then with R. does little to lift her exhaustion, and she confesses to deep weariness and even a longing for death. Their precarious situation with the theater and the unsettling nighttime heart episode leave her physically shaken and emotionally depleted. |
| February 8, 1874 | 421 | Unsettled weather mirrors the feeling that she and R. have been pushed outside ordinary life, while practical worries about the builders and the King’s reliability force them to consider paying debts from her savings. Between a strange dream, a foolish play, and another hurtful remark from Daniella, her despair grows into a raw sense of her heart being shattered yet still held together by habit and endurance. |
| February 9, 1874 | 78 | A letter from Schott finally allows the contract to be settled on what R. sees as honorable terms, briefly easing the uncertainty around the enterprise. Even so, the King’s request for formal guarantees and the need for further opinions keep the future performances unresolved and still dependent on outside judgment. |
| February 10, 1874 | 409 | After a week of poor eyesight, she returns to the diary with the sense that both the work and the household are burdening R. at once. A faulty piano arrangement, delays in preparing the score, and continued house troubles feed her fear that he will overtax himself, even as family moments and the arrival of a new piano stir memory and tenderness. |
| February 17, 1874 | 237 | Eva’s birthday is marked with affectionate rituals and a renewed awareness of the intensity binding R. and her together. Amid the children’s excitement and R.’s ongoing corrections, the evening turns reflective as he links the Nibelungen poet to wandering genius and to the fragile survival of great art through print. |
| February 18, 1874 | 308 | The day is shadowed by worries at home, Wagner’s poor health, and renewed anxiety over the Bayreuth arrangements, all while gossip from Munich and attacks on his reputation stir his irritation. Amid the strain, he and his circle keep returning to books and judgments about theology, philosophy, and music, but the larger mood is one of frustration and vigilance. |
| February 19, 1874 | 116 | Wagner remains restless through the night, preoccupied with the decoration dispute and the guarantee’s terms, though the Women’s Wagner Society offers a welcome contribution. The household stays calm on the surface, with reading, a Beethoven piece for the newspaper, and a lively retelling of William Tell providing brief relief from the underlying tension. |
| February 20, 1874 | 134 | The morning opens with an absurdly uneasy dream, and the day carries that uneasy air into the practical business of ice skating with the children and a difficult conference with Feustel. Progress on the festival looks increasingly compromised by the king’s limited support, the need to revise plans, and a general sense of disappointment among the committee. |
| February 21, 1874 | 85 | Her failing eyesight and the doctor’s uncertainty cast a heavy pall over the day, and even talk of Lourdes suggests how little comfort she can find in practical remedies. Still, the household keeps moving, with house matters, Feustel’s travel, news of illness and public affairs, and a useful donation from Heintze offering scattered signs of support. |
| February 22, 1874 | 73 | She writes to the king and sends family photographs, a gesture that keeps political and personal loyalties closely intertwined. Meanwhile Wagner finally settles into his score, and the evening turns intellectual as they read Nietzsche and find his opening too abstract to satisfy them. |
| February 23, 1874 | 57 | The day feels quieter and more inward, marked by her old-fashioned green eyeshade and Wagner’s productive work. Their reading of a friend’s book brings real enthusiasm, especially for its sharpness and courage, and it leads them to dismiss the modern world as shallow by comparison. |
| February 24, 1874 | 35 | Her eye trouble still leaves her nearly immobilized, and the house’s slow progress only reinforces the sense of suspension. With little news from outside, the evening is devoted to finishing the book they have been absorbed in, which continues to hold their interest. |
| February 25, 1874 | 76 | Conversation centers on the friend’s treatise, whose brilliance and energy impress them, while Wagner keeps working and the household continues its routines. A visit from the dean adds warmth and originality to the day, though his remarks about the religious struggle give the visit a sharper political edge. |
| February 26, 1874 | 222 | A note from the emperor strengthens their sense that Prussia remains firm, even as the dean’s earlier view is shown to have been mistaken. Wagner works steadily, buoyed by donations and by the Nibelungen images in their hall, while the evening’s reading and discussion move between comic court anecdotes and reflections on cultural greatness. |
| February 27, 1874 | 661 | Wagner divides his time between productive labor and practical attention to the house, which seems to give him genuine satisfaction. Their conversations about Fidi’s cheerfulness, poetic growth, tempo, and German language reveal a household that keeps turning daily details into larger reflections on character, art, and discipline. The day closes with a mix of amusement, intimacy, and lingering concern about contracts, performances, and the demands of serious work. |
| No diary entries found. | ||