Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| January 1, 1880 | 106 | The new year began late after a long night, so R. skipped the studio because he was exhausted and dealing with inflamed eyes. The children and I went to Tannhäuser, which I found deeply moving, and I was quietly relieved not to have R. present for the public applause he would have drawn at the Munich theater. |
| January 2, 1880 | 164 | R. slept badly, and I kept him company while we talked about Tannhäuser before lunch with Lenbach and Levi. The day was full of irritations over travel arrangements and the hotel, but Lenbach’s Bismarck portrait and a visit to Gedon’s studio reminded us how little Germany rewards real talent. In the evening R. was pleased that Bezold treated his ears successfully and we ended the day early. |
| January 3, 1880 | 62 | We left at nine and the journey quickly became wearisome, with border delays, renewed charges in Ala, confusion in Bologna, and a stifling carriage whose hot stove forced us to open the windows against the cold. R. cared little for the scenery and the Brenner only added to the annoyance. The trip was already proving difficult before we had even reached Naples. |
| January 4, 1880 | 74 | Sunday brought sunshine and better spirits as the worst of the travel was finally behind us, and we reached Naples with Gersdorff waiting to greet us. The joy of arrival was cut short by missing trunks and hotel trickery, but the finer weather and the sense of being almost settled kept us going. Despite the nuisance, the day felt like a real arrival after the strain of the road. |
| January 5, 1880 | 48 | Bright sun and a magnificent view made up for the trouble, and R. immediately set about having all the furniture rearranged. He directed the changes with great energy, which created more friction, but the beauty around us steadily revived our moods. Our surroundings gave us back the calm that the moving and unpacking took away. |
| January 6, 1880 | 67 | The family had another quiet day indoors because erysipelas returned and Eva came down with acute rheumatism. In the evening I read aloud from Chancellor Muller’s Goethe, and R. enjoyed it enough to savor its contempt for other people’s opinions. Even confinement felt lighter when we could share ideas we both liked. |
| January 7, 1880 | 252 | R. was still ill, with the rash worsening and Eva’s knee causing her severe pain, so patience was all we had. He spent much of the day reading Goethe material and speaking warmly about the moral seriousness and benevolence he found in it, while also mocking newspapers and the pretensions of Germans abroad. Though frustrated by being stuck indoors, he kept turning the conversation into larger reflections on religion, history, and human folly. |
| January 8, 1880 | 170 | By the eighth, R. was improving and Eva was livelier, and I finally took my first walk in the garden, enjoying the light and the music from Tannhäuser in my thoughts. R. was reading a French vegetarian work and filling the day with lively examples and sweeping ideas about history and human violence. He remained impatient with his mask and confinement, but his spirits were clearly better. |
| January 9, 1880 | 223 | Both patients slept well, and the morning conversation turned to Goethe, repentance, and the kind of daily self-examination R. thought was the only genuine religion. He was absorbed by the vegetarian book, admired its author, and ordered it for himself, while I later walked with the children and R. tried to guide Gersdorff out of his confused situation. The evening ended in contentment after I recounted the odd sights we had seen on our outing to the Gulf of Baia. |
| January 10, 1880 | 222 | R. felt unwell again, with his stomach troubling him even as the erysipelas faded, and I fought off my own dark thoughts by forcing myself to stay cheerful. The children delighted in collecting shells on the beach, while R. and I discussed Thalysia, Renan, and the French character of certain spiritual temperaments. A grateful letter from a woman in Zulllichau arrived, and the evening turned into a long discussion of national character, with R. repeating his harsh judgments about Italians growing bitter in old age. |
| January 11, 1880 | 377 | R improves a little after a bout of illness, and the household takes comfort in ordinary sounds like a rooster crowing. The day turns into a long conversation about music, Germany, Italy, and the moral meaning of art, but by evening his condition worsens and the diarist ends the entry in private fear and isolation. |
| January 12, 1880 | 219 | R is steadier and better rested, and a visit from Herr von Stein lifts the mood with news from Vienna and recollections of major musical works. Discussion with guests turns to Goethe, Weimar, and the difficult conditions under which great work was done. |
| January 13, 1880 | 421 | R has a better night and remains in good spirits despite anxiety about erysipelas, joking that he is serious only once a week. The day is filled with technical talk about Weber, mistrusted memoirs, socialism, Christianity, and the nature of Christ, leaving him agitated and physically drained. |
| January 14, 1880 | 271 | After a dream about Beethoven and a morning of reflections on yesterday’s argument, R enjoys his first outing in fine weather and is deeply moved by the landscape and a beggar woman’s cry. Conversation later turns to folk song and the way Italian opera displaced older musical traditions. |
| January 15, 1880 | 748 | Bad weather keeps R indoors, but he spends the day reading Goethe and reminiscing about childhood fears, early musical memories, and his first encounters with key artistic ideas. He contrasts Goethe and Schiller, dismisses modern political hollowiness, and returns repeatedly to unfinished thoughts about poets, pedagogy, and the limits of reform. |
| January 16, 1880 | 543 | Despite a rough night, R revels in a drive through Naples, insisting the city feels vividly alive in a way that ruins and cosmopolitan capitals do not. The day includes practical errands, discussion of the Camorra, financial sorting, and sweeping reflections on civilizational decline, religion, Beethoven, and Wagner’s own place beside Goethe. |
| January 17, 1880 | 602 | R rests better and reads Schopenhauer and Goethe with unusual pleasure, while becoming more impatient with jokes at Christianity’s expense. He goes into the city on the streetcar, later attends a performance of La Juive, and praises the work’s musical power even as he condemns the staging and the decay of grand opera. |
| January 18, 1880 | 461 | Rain keeps the day subdued, but R continues reading Goethe and commenting on the old life in Weimar, while also making sharp observations about English politics and Russian possibilities. Visitors and conversations from town lead him into larger geopolitical fantasies, though the evening ends with the diarist uneasy about his appearance. |
| January 19, 1880 | 187 | R starts the day nervous but absorbed in Schopenhauer, especially in the portrait and character of Johanna Schopenhauer. A short outing tires him badly, and even his reading of Don Quixote loses its former sparkle, though the town and especially a nearby trattoria still delight him. |
| January 20, 1880 | 179 | A severe cold and troubling news from Jager leave R exhausted and irritable, and even a barber visit is too much for him. In the evening he reads Goethe’s Clavigo to the household and reflects the next day on geology, water, and the idea that human cruelty began with history and the first killing of an animal. |
| January 21, 1880 | 275 | R. slept well and enjoyed the mild, windy weather while receiving the directors of San Carlo, whom he lectured in French on the decline of modern opera and the discipline Rossini demanded of singers. He also spoke sharply about Napoleon, dismissed a much-discussed conversation with Goethe as unimportant, and ended the day with concern over Siegfried’s boils and a reassuring exam from Dr. Schr. |
| January 22, 1880 | 249 | After another good night, R. was deeply moved by reading about Goethe’s death and reflected on the sorrow of his last bond with Ulrike von Levetzow. A very slow walk brought him delight in the landscape, workers, and animals, and in the evening he offered political and economic remarks before a game of whist. |
| January 23, 1880 | 286 | R. worked on a complaint-filled letter to the King and enjoyed reading Thalysia, though an afternoon ride left him tired. In the evening a Neapolitan folk singer impressed everyone, especially when R. played the Rhine theme and the music turned their thoughts from sensuality toward innocence and nature. He also rejected Renan as old news and burst into anger over anti-Jewish comments, blaming weakness rather than the French crowd alone. |
| January 24, 1880 | 186 | Though he slept well, R. still felt worn down as he continued his letter to the King and then made a brief windy walk in the garden. At dinner with Prince Ouroussoff he charmed the company with wit about Russia, Constantinople, and Italian music, but eventually tired of the introductions and called for the carriage. |
| January 25, 1880 | 184 | Cold rain and no sun set a gloomy tone as R. finished his letter to the King and lost badly at whist. He grew despondent about the harsh winter, felt driven to withdraw from the world, and spoke with painful nostalgia about Wahnfried, the children, Tribschen, and the earlier life of quiet love and creative work. |
| January 26, 1880 | 81 | After a good night, R. reflected at breakfast on the myth of Helios’s oxen and grew more convinced that meat-eating lies at the root of human wickedness. Later, on a gray day, he rode into town, lost his appetite at lunch, and went to bed shivering, while his companion handled a stack of letters postponing visits. |
| January 27, 1880 | 41 | R. was confined to bed with erysipelas and grew increasingly lethargic and irritable, though the doctor remained unconcerned. By evening he could no longer eat, and his only activity was lying still in a worsening state of illness. |
| January 28, 1880 | 86 | He had a miserable night and was in severe discomfort, but his mind stayed active, drifting to the Roman Senate and Regulus’s widow. He rejected medicines with skepticism, saying that what he lacked was faith, and only briefly rose in the evening before returning to bed. |
| January 29, 1880 | 328 | Though the night was slightly better, the illness had spread across his forehead and left him exhausted while the rest of the household remembered a bright, warm day outside. R. alternated between scholarly talk about Bajazet, nomadic peoples, and sacrifice, and the diarist was unsettled by his dreams and by memories of his illness in Paris and the strange scent associated with it. |
| January 30, 1880 | 164 | After a restless night, R.’s rash began to subside and he spent the day in the salon, noticeably more animated despite his fatigue. He praised the intelligent preface to Renan’s work, played the chorus of the young pilgrims from Tannhäuser, and moved the diarist to tears by making his recovery feel bound up with the work’s Christian spirit. |
| January 31, 1880 | 330 | R. slept a little better and the rash continued to fade, though his rheumatic and catarrhal troubles returned and darkened his mood. After talking about philosophy and then the worsening state of Germany, he became deeply agitated and spoke of emigration and political decay. |
| No diary entries found. | ||