Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| July 1, 1873 | 260 | The day is shaped by a mix of domestic calm and looming legal anxiety. A troubling report about the Leipzig theater dispute deepens uncertainty, though Feustel’s kindness offers some relief. The new house and the bust suggest progress and a warmer family life, and the day ends with R.'s grim thought that good things arrive slowly while bad things strike without warning. |
| July 2, 1873 | 461 | The morning opens with R.'s affectionate declaration that the narrator has been sent from heaven, setting an intimate tone. Conversation turns to politics and cultural decline, especially fears about Prussia, Bismarck, and the deterioration of language in newspapers and scholarship. Later, family life and work continue amid small scenes of child rebellion, literary reading, and admiration for the Nibelungenlied, which is praised for its folk power and contrasted with weaker poets. |
| July 3, 1873 | 384 | The day begins in emotional unrest, with a sleepless night and anxious thoughts, but is brightened by Makart's Abmdantia, which the narrator finds original and powerful. Both are struck by the tragedy of a great work meant for a specific place but forced into wandering exhibition. The evening shifts toward friendship, art, and melancholy reflection, ending with birdsong, sunset, and thoughts of death tempered by the consolation of the garden. |
| July 4, 1873 | 350 | Clear weather brings a steadier mood, and the day divides between work, gardening, and literary reflection. The discussion of Siegfried, Brünnhilde, and Saint Paul leads to meditations on tragedy, faith, and the soul's relation to guilt and obedience. The evening reading of the Nibelungenlied deepens admiration for its second part, while affectionate banter between the couple underscores how their shared life gives meaning to everything around R. |
| July 5, 1873 | 119 | The main emotional event is the first full sight of the great theater scaffolding and auditorium at the Burgerreuth. What had existed only as an idea now appears overwhelming and almost grave-like, inspiring a fear that is hard to name. The day remains outwardly pleasant, but beneath the cheerful supper there is a sense of awe at the scale and audacity of what is being built. |
| July 6, 1873 | 35 | The day is quiet and domestic, centered on church, family lunch, a visit to Makart's painting, and the house. Even so, the ongoing work at the fountain and sitting area keeps the larger project present. The note about R. not feeling entirely well leaves the day with a subdued edge. |
| July 7, 1873 | 59 | Practical burdens intrude when the nursemaid falls ill and the narrator must take over her duties. R. works and reads Holtzmann's Germanic Antiquities with interest, while letters arrive from Barcelona announcing a new Wagner society. The day is otherwise marked by routine visits to the sitting and an evening spent with Uhland. |
| July 8, 1873 | 56 | Though the bust is finally completed and judged very good, the day is still dominated by work dissatisfaction and public-cultural concerns. R. must redo a page, and the narrator notes political despair in France and courage in Switzerland. A warm letter from Marie Donhoff adds a welcome note of support to an otherwise laboring day. |
| July 9, 1873 | 411 | The day opens with a striking dream in which guilt, rank, and the fear of false accusation produce intense moral distress. Real anxieties follow in the theater business, with inspections, awkward visitors, and frustration over Wolffel's conduct. Yet the bust brings satisfaction, and the evening reading of Uhland is elevated by a passage that the narrator hears as carrying Luther's spirit. |
| July 10, 1873 | 250 | A Freidank line about building on joy like a rainbow lends the day a light philosophical frame. Work, child care, letters, and an outing to the Eremitage fill the hours, with the fountains delighting the children and Frederick the Great lingering in the background of thought. The evening's music and theatrical impressions, however imperfectly realized, move the narrator toward a vision of redemption through beauty and shared feeling. |
| July 11, 1873 | 116 | The day is marked by a blend of public news, domestic routine, and private feeling. Reports of deaths, operatic absences, and a worried note about a friend’s sick son give the entry a somber tone, while the household continues to move between the new house and the woods. The evening returns to poetry, architecture, and a sense that practical affairs are slowly settling into place. |
| July 12, 1873 | 60 | Practical obligations dominate, with the mortgage signed and work resumed. A social visit proves uncomfortable, so solace comes instead from reading about Roman religion and social divisions. The entry contrasts financial responsibility and social friction with the refuge of scholarly absorption. |
| July 13, 1873 | 33 | The day remains centered on the house, the children, and interior arrangements. A brief thunderstorm interrupts the usual movement between family lunch and the building site, but otherwise life feels steady and repetitive. Reading continues in the evening, and the focus remains on shaping both the home and the atmosphere around it. |
| July 14, 1873 | 121 | Routine and labor continue, with the composer occupied by the score and by questions of German identity and antiquity. The entry mixes intellectual seriousness with amusement at political absurdity and concern for a publisher’s health. It suggests a household that is both industrious and reflective, with practical worries never far from cultural debate. |
| July 15, 1873 | 69 | The day is quiet and monotonous, with irritation over the house but some relief in the painter’s courteous letter. A comic anecdote about the barber’s supposed Italian origin lightens the mood, exposing how easily names and identities can be mistaken or invented. The evening returns, as usual, to reading. |
| July 16, 1873 | 74 | The outside world seems distant, and the household continues in a repetitive rhythm of family lunch and visits to the house. There is a decision to avoid exterior ornament and trust instead in proportion and simplicity. Even the mention of a scholarly honor for a friend folds back into the recurring world of artistic and intellectual labor. |
| July 17, 1873 | 76 | Workiness and domestic trouble dominate, yet the composer’s renewed enjoyment of labor gives the day some energy. A conversation about deafness and blindness turns reflective, weighing sensory suffering against distraction and experience. The entry closes with the first volume of reading and a sense that quiet itself has become a condition to endure. |
| July 19, 1873 | 123 | This entry is more meditative and inward, shaped by exhaustion, sleeplessness, and a feeling that solitude here is less sheltered than before. Reflections on existence, toil, and the burden of life give the day a philosophic cast, even as work on the music continues through a detail like the glockenspiel in Brünnhilde’s farewell. The passage also hints at shared unease about the point of making and laboring at all. |
| July 20, 1873 | 529 | The day moves through music, memory, and sharp conversation, beginning with a birthday cantata theme that awakens cheerful recollections. Thoughts of memorial music, philosophy, and tragedy lead to a series of vivid associations about art, belief, and German myth. The entry ends with walks, books, and theatrical news, all held together by a strong sense of cultural inheritance and symbolic meaning. |
| July 21, 1873 | 79 | The final entry returns to practical errands and correspondence, but its center is still intellectual and musical. Reading about Kaspar Hauser and discussing a theater ceremony sit beside thoughts of family and invitations, while a musical remark links Beethoven, Auber, and Schopenhauer. The overall effect is of a life in which daily logistics and high artistic reflection are continuously interwoven. |
| July 22, 1873 | 222 | They prepared for the roof-raising ceremony and wrote to the speaker's father to invite him. The day mixed domestic calm, a woodland rest with the children, and supper at Biirgerreuth with ongoing work and writing by R. The evening turned to discussion of Daumet's book and suspicions of political or clerical manipulation behind its publication. The entry closes on R.'s tense mood, caught between tears and irritability. |
| July 23, 1873 | 140 | The day was spent in household care and attending to the children while R. worked and remained generally well. Workers began on the burial vault, and a walk back through the meadows at sunset prompted deep reflection. The writer accepts even the prospect of hardship for the children as part of life. Despite that acceptance, she notes how hard it is to preserve outward cheerfulness and how strongly the struggle for it is felt. |
| July 24, 1873 | 145 | R. worked in heavy weather and discussed remarks from the Riedelsberg about the mediatization of princes and the degradation of the nobility. The conversation turned bitterly political, contrasting old aristocratic culture with modern literary figures. Herr von Meyern, a former theater manager, visited and joined them for an outing to the theater. The evening ended with a playful but self-conscious retreat into their own private world. |
| July 25, 1873 | 89 | An evening conversation left R. shaken by nightmares in which he imagined bandits and feared exposure over stolen money. The diary then jumps forward two weeks, resuming from memory. Captain von Steinitz and his wife arrived and stayed for the evening. Although the lady meant well, her theatrical habits made R. doubt he could endure her easily. |
| July 26, 1873 | 135 | The writer tried to prepare lodging for her father and went to Neumarkt to meet him, but he arrived later than expected, forcing her to return first. Klindworth suddenly appeared to collect Götterdämmerung for arranging, adding to the day's bustle. Her father finally came tired and worn out, and the evening was devoted to music. R.'s singing of a scene from Der Fliegende Holländer moved everyone deeply, especially because it seemed to reflect their own situation. |
| July 27, 1873 | 46 | The writer visited her father in the morning and brought him back for lunch, then spent the afternoon and evening in more music-making. Frau von Steinitz joined for a musical session featuring Lohengrin, and the new house was also visited. Her father played various pieces later in the day. The tone is quiet, domestic, and centered on shared music. |
| July 28, 1873 | 121 | The day opened with her father speaking encouragingly about Hans, his prospects in England, and money he had set aside for the children. In the afternoon they performed the third act of Siegfried with Klindworth accompanying, and R.'s singing made a strong impression. Her father predicted that even excellent musicians might not fully grasp the richness of these works for many years. The day also included reading polemical pamphlets and visiting the theater building. |
| July 29, 1873 | 124 | The family lived quietly with her father, whose health had improved and who seemed to enjoy the unfamiliar domestic routine. He still had French supplies, but they gave him German things to read instead. She took the children to the Eremitage, where Lusch misbehaved toward Eva. The evening returned to music, and she also records a sharp reply from R. to criticism of his essay on Devrient. |
| July 30, 1873 | 63 | A full family lunch with her father pleased everyone, especially because he repeatedly praised Fidi as a remarkable boy. R. worked but seemed tired and irritated, feeling he had no proper place in her life with her father present. The evening remained musical, with the children and family gathered together. His weariness and emotional strain color the day's otherwise warm family atmosphere. |
| July 31, 1873 | 160 | The children visited their grandfather and enjoyed themselves, but the day ended badly when a quarrel broke out at home, as usual centered on Eva. She appealed to R. to discipline the older girls, and for the first time he struck Daniella and Blandine, shocking them deeply. That evening the dean, mayor, and Dr. Landgraf came to hear music, and the performance of the Opus 106 adagio overwhelmed the guests. Afterward R. fell into remorse, weeping and lamenting that he had no right to punish the children. |
| No diary entries found. | ||