Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| July 1, 1879 | 358 | The day opens with a rough night for R., but he rallies enough to host guests and keep the household moving. Even so, the entry centers on conversation, music, and a restorative evening drive, which turns the landscape into a mood of quiet resignation and longing. |
| July 2, 1879 | 485 | R. is again kept awake and starts the day irritable, though his mood softens as the doctor’s visit and good conversation steady him. The rest of the day is filled with reading, literary reflections, and his delight in Frantz, while the writer is left wrestling with the inadequacy of words. |
| July 3, 1879 | 273 | Another miserable night leaves R. exhausted and physically unwell, yet he still manages flashes of wit and insight. His comments on false appearances and a striking passage in Weber reveal that his artistic perception remains vivid even in distress. |
| July 4, 1879 | 149 | After a bad stretch, R. finally sleeps well and greets the day with renewed spirit. He spends it playing music, enjoying the garden, and finding fault with Frantz only when the author seems to understate the Catholic Church’s role in Germany’s history. |
| July 5, 1879 | 188 | The household starts on a cheerful note, but the weather turns cold and wet, and R. grows critical over the dryness of Cherubini and the conventions of musical taste. He also turns over Frantz’s tax ideas and reacts sharply to the way major historical figures are being judged. |
| July 6, 1879 | 256 | A good night puts R. in buoyant form, and breakfast turns into wide-ranging talk about women’s emancipation, literature, and dramatic characters. The mood darkens when news arrives that Parsifal cannot be staged next year, leaving him angry, too upset to eat, and unable to settle. |
| July 7, 1879 | 429 | R. gets only broken sleep, but practical news and letters keep the morning from collapsing entirely. The main burden of the day is the financing and announcement of Parsifal, which drives him toward thoughts of America, though he steadies himself by drafting a firm letter to the King. |
| July 8, 1879 | 501 | With better sleep, R. regains composure and uses the day to settle business, reply to letters, and listen to music. A long, powerful hearing of Tristan becomes the emotional center of the entry, followed by reflections on how an artist transforms experience into vision rather than simple autobiography. |
| July 9, 1879 | 373 | R. continues reading Frantz with pleasure, but the same old anxieties about America and the future return in conversation. The day mixes private tenderness with practical fear, then closes with visits, whist, and Frantz’s sharp character sketches of major Prussian figures. |
| July 10, 1879 | 164 | R. wakes in good spirits despite terrible weather and spends part of the day working on his article and examining Weber’s texts. A stormy outing to a church concert provides a few uplifting moments, but he remains exacting about the sung text and dismissive afterward of Schumann. |
| July 11, 1879 | 103 | R. spent a rough, weather-bound day recovering from a cold, while the narrator tried to make sense of the damp gloom by talking of Naples and roses. After a welcome reply approving her request, the evening turned to Calderon, whose playful wit she found more awkward than amusing. |
| July 12, 1879 | 168 | R. was clearly better and absorbed in reading C. Frantz, while the narrator moved between fairy tales, weakness, and the companionship of ordinary conversation. Their talk ranged from the Arabs’ love of form to Bismarck’s bluster, and ended on a startlingly tender reflection about divine love and their own affection. |
| July 13, 1879 | 241 | The day centered on R.’s engagement with Frantz’s work, which led him into broader thoughts about faith, truth, and the uneasy condition of their age. Walks, conversation with friends, and music filled the rest of the day, alongside his admiration for America and anxieties about political collapse. |
| July 14, 1879 | 422 | After a morning of mutual reluctance to part, R. finished Frantz’s book and composed a forceful reply that left him dizzy with effort. Later they read a shallow pamphlet and listened to music, while the narrator noted his joking recollection of how one of his own themes had once passed for something else. |
| July 16, 1879 | 118 | R. was lively and reflective, speaking about religion, politics, and the search for ideal truth while the narrator felt unusually dreamy and slightly dejected. The evening was brightened by American visitors, and music from several works restored a sense of grandeur and comfort. |
| July 17, 1879 | 317 | A pleasant night and an evocative dream set the tone for a day in which R. worked on his article and hoped for better weather. A visitor from Paris brought news of Claire and stories of the city, and the evening became a sociable gathering with friends. |
| July 18, 1879 | 197 | R. woke early and watched the moon before a fine day opened into convivial meals and visits from friends returning from London. Music, letters, and an anecdote about Beethoven and Weber filled the evening, with the narrator especially struck by the popular force of great themes. |
| July 19, 1879 | 154 | The narrator was overwhelmed by sadness, feeling drained by ordinary duties and stirred by news from Claire into a deep longing for an earlier, vanished world. She sought relief in reading, even finding the idea of convent life newly attractive, before recovering enough to laugh at herself by evening. |
| July 20, 1879 | 81 | An outing to Dommayer’s and Fantaisie brought unusually bright spirits, with the landscape and old memories of hope lending the day a nostalgic glow. R. especially enjoyed the roadside scenes and then turned the conversation to craft, discussing rhyme and musical prosody with characteristic precision. |
| July 21, 1879 | 175 | R. had another poor night, likely worsened by overeating, while the day remained dull and political reading offered little comfort. He nevertheless kept working on articles and legal matters, and the evening ended on a lighter note with Gogol’s comic play and a little whist. |
| July 22, 1879 | 189 | The day is dominated by failed negotiations, sleeplessness, and a doctor’s reluctant opinion that a cure should not begin because bad weather is approaching. Amid the frustration, the household still finds humor in absurd medical suggestions and ends the evening in conversation about miners, labor violence, and the moral horror of their suffering. |
| July 23, 1879 | 488 | Restless night or not, he keeps working, while the writer’s mood darkens further after grim public news and the sense that art feels pointless in the face of social cruelty. The suicide of the municipal gardener deepens the melancholy, yet the day also moves through reflections on death, ghost stories, and a lively card game that briefly restores some warmth. |
| July 24, 1879 | 216 | He makes steady progress on his article and is pleased with its closing joke, though the family also worries about money, public support, and the future of their project. The evening mixes theoretical conversation, musical reminiscence, and concern for a child’s company, all set against a garden that feels quietly beautiful. |
| July 25, 1879 | 169 | A good night is followed by delight over newly hatched chicks, and the morning drifts through literary and mythic conversation before turning to work. The afternoon brings a peaceful outing and a funeral in the background, and the day closes with a long philosophical discussion that stretches late into the night. |
| July 26, 1879 | 173 | The household enjoys fine weather, children, and a country excursion, while he continues working and shares another humorous line from his writing. Beneath the pleasant outing lies disappointment over a correspondent’s drift toward Catholic politics and a general disappointment in intellectual clarity. |
| July 27, 1879 | 137 | Thunder and cold keep everyone subdued, but work and small domestic amusements continue, including a comic episode at a cafe involving their child. In the evening they compare contemporary operas, finding some musically better than others but largely agreeing that the whole lot is not worth taking very seriously. |
| July 28, 1879 | 134 | He remains productive while she prepares for her father’s visit and tries to make sense of the sadness in letters from an ailing acquaintance. The day includes a small success in securing employment for someone old in the troupe, but also a stretch of despair that finally gives way to shared laughter in the evening. |
| July 29, 1879 | 134 | After finishing the article, he joins a pleasant outing through woods and hills with a large group, and the countryside lifts everyone’s spirits. The evening turns political, with heated talk about Bismarck and the shortcomings of statesmanship, before ending on a calmer note. |
| July 30, 1879 | 583 | A walk and a dose of the cure are followed by chest discomfort and a mood of physical and emotional heaviness. Work on the article continues, but the evening is disrupted by upsetting treatment of their child, leading to a serious discussion about art, survival, and the fear that the family’s larger project may fail. |
| July 31, 1879 | 603 | Poor sleep and the cure lead into dense philosophical talk about will, law, and moral action, then a troubling appeal against vivisection that stirs him deeply. The day closes with reflections on compassion, religion, and music, as he rejects cold pedantry and searches for a more humane cultural ideal. |
| No diary entries found. | ||