Cosima's Diaries
Recordings by Cosima Wagner between 1869 and 1883
Cosima Wagner kept her diaries from 1 January 1869 at Tribschen until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, so that Siegfried would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: Wagner’s talk, his dreams, the evening readings, the music, the visitors, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear him thinking aloud for so long. The diaries follow the Tribschen idyll, the building of the Bayreuth festival theatre and the composition of Parsifal.
The entries are arranged by year and month and each can be opened on its own page. The sections below trace the main lines of the diaries.
Cosima Wagner began her diaries at Tribschen on 1 January 1869 and kept them until the night before Wagner’s death in Venice on 13 February 1883. She wrote them for her children, and above all for Siegfried, so that he would one day know his father “truly,” and she wrote nearly every day: what Wagner said at breakfast, his dreams, the evening readings of Shakespeare, Calderón and Goethe, the music played at the piano, the visitors, illnesses, debts and quarrels. No other source lets us hear Wagner thinking aloud for so long, or shows so clearly how his ideas moved in his last fourteen years. At Tribschen the household lives in a private idyll, sealed by the birth of a son and by marriage, with the Ring resumed and Nietzsche a frequent guest. From 1872 everything turns to Bayreuth and the building of a festival theatre, achieved through years of fundraising and near collapse. After the 1876 Ring the diaries draw inward to Parsifal, written at Wahnfried and finished on long Italian journeys, while Wagner’s talk reaches toward a religion of compassion drawn from Schopenhauer, Buddhism and the Gospels. The same pages record, often and plainly, the antisemitism of both Wagner and Cosima.
Tribschen. The first pages are a confession. Cosima, who had left Hans von Bülow for Wagner, calls her love “a rebirth, a deliverance,” and writes under a constant sense of guilt toward her husband that she never lost. The years at Tribschen bring the birth of Siegfried in June 1869, her divorce and her marriage to Wagner in the Protestant church at Lucerne on 25 August 1870, the Franco-Prussian War, the essay Beethoven and the completion of Siegfried. On her birthday that Christmas she woke to the Siegfried Idyll played on the staircase. Nietzsche first called on 17 May 1869 and became almost one of the family; his manuscript on the birth of tragedy arrived as a Christmas gift in 1870. Wagner’s remarks already circle the themes of his last years. Music, he said in November 1869, “is the direct product of Christianity, as is the saint,” and the next spring he described the Knight of the Grail as free because “he acts, not in his own behalf, but for others.” If anyone asked whether there was a God, he said in 1870, he would answer that at a moment when thousands are singing to him, “God is alive, he is there.”
Founding Bayreuth. In April 1871 the Wagners first saw Bayreuth; its baroque opera house “will not do for us at all; so we must build.” The foundation stone was laid in the rain on 22 May 1872, Wagner’s birthday, followed by the Ninth Symphony in the old opera house. The next four years are full of patrons, Wagner societies, singers, architects, concert tours and money. A royal loan in 1874 rescued the enterprise, and the family moved into Wahnfried that April. On 21 November 1874 Wagner finished the score of Götterdämmerung, a day Cosima remembered with tears, because he was hurt to find her reading a letter from her father at that moment. In between, Cosima converted to Protestantism on 31 October 1872 and took Communion with Wagner: “I felt as if our bond had only now been truly sealed.”
The first festival. The Ring was given complete for the first time in August 1876, before the German Emperor and much of musical Europe. The diaries record the mishaps as well as the triumph, and the exhaustion afterwards: looking back that November, Wagner said his main feeling during the performances had been “Never again, never again!” The festival left a large deficit, and the autumn in Italy brought two meetings that would shape the coming years: the last time the Wagners spent with Nietzsche, at Sorrento, and the first meeting with Count Arthur de Gobineau in Rome on 30 November.
The Parsifal years. Wagner began Parsifal in earnest in 1877 and finished the prose draft on 28 February (“The Redeemer unchained!” Cosima wrote) and the poem on 19 April. Composing the Communion scene that August, he told her that “this scene of Holy Communion will be the main scene, the core of the whole work.” The music grew slowly through 1878 and 1879 beside the founding of the Bayreuther Blätter, the regenerative essays and campaigns against vivisection, and the widening break with Nietzsche. In 1880 the family moved to Naples, where Paul von Joukowsky joined them as stage designer and the garden at Ravello suggested Klingsor’s magic garden; in Siena that August the cathedral moved Wagner to tears and became a model for the Temple of the Grail. That November he conducted the Prelude privately for King Ludwig in Munich. Gobineau stayed at Wahnfried in 1881, and Wagner read his books on race and on the Persians with growing enthusiasm. The score was finished in Palermo on 13 January 1882. “With this, as with all his other works,” Cosima wrote, “he had feared being interrupted by death.”
The premiere and Venice. Sixteen performances of Parsifal followed in July and August 1882, conducted by Hermann Levi. Wagner asked that the audience not call the singers out after the second act, rebuked a chorister for joking about the bread, and at the last performance took the baton himself for the end of the third act. The family then settled in the Palazzo Vendramin in Venice. The last months bring the news of Gobineau’s death, Liszt’s long visit, Hans von Bülow’s breakdown, and on Christmas Eve a performance at La Fenice of the symphony Wagner had written at nineteen, played as a birthday present to Cosima. He was weakened by repeated heart spasms, and he was still talking about writing symphonies and an essay on the feminine. The last entry, on 12 February 1883, ends with him at the piano playing the Rhinedaughters’ lament: “Extraordinary that I saw this so clearly at that time!”
Spirituality. The diaries are themselves partly a religious document. Cosima wrote under a sense of “unatonable guilt” toward Bülow and turned it into a discipline of renunciation. After her conversion she took Communion regularly, writing in 1873 that “the only true communion with people is before the altar,” and she read Meister Eckhart, Tauler, the Theologia Germanica and the Imitation of Christ (“Non sum! How dearly I should like to make that my motto!”). Her devotion to Wagner took the same form, and she wrote that in him she found “not my happiness, but my salvation.”
Wagner’s own faith was heterodox and he said so. Its foundation was Schopenhauer: “it was Schopenhauer who revealed Christianity to me,” he told Cosima in 1879. Through Schopenhauer came Buddhism and the Vedanta, which run through the diaries from first to last: the Buddhist drama Die Sieger, often planned and never written; the Brahmin saying “tat tvam asi,” which he spoke to Cosima at Christmas 1874; readings of the Bhagavad-Gita, the Upanishads and, in Venice, a new life of the Buddha. He set the two traditions side by side rather than choosing between them. Brahmanism was “the religion of intelligence,” but Christianity stood above it as “the religion of suffering.” Buddhism was “a flowering of the human spirit” with no church and no compulsion, and by studying the Buddha, he said in 1882, “one learns to understand Christianity.” Cosima put the difference in a sentence of her own: “Buddha does not move one, he teaches; Christ teaches by moving.”
At the centre stood Christ, kept apart from the church. “I do not believe in God, but in godliness, which is revealed in a Jesus without sin,” Wagner said in 1879, and he repeatedly complained that people “think only of the church and confuse this with Christianity.” In his last years he said that he recognized “no religion except compassion,” extended to animals as well as people, and this lay behind his vegetarian leanings and his fury at vivisection. Art was to carry what the churches had lost. “Art makes religions eternal,” he said in 1872; music was “the only possible church nowadays”; and in 1879 he gave the core of Religion and Art in a sentence, that religion should “influence ethics, and allow faith to be represented by art, which can transform illusion into truth.” “The path from religion to art bad, from art to religion good,” he noted in 1880.
Parsifal was where these ideas met, and the diaries show how carefully he guarded its tone. He called it “his most propitiatory work” and spoke of it as the dream vision of a rite, not the rite itself. He kept Christ off the stage on principle: “One cannot paint Christ, but one can portray him in music,” and to have Christ sung by a tenor was “a disgusting idea.” What he hoped for from his audience was less instruction than inward change, a recognition of suffering that leads to compassion and resignation. In December 1882 he said he would never again try to explain his ideas on the blood of Christ: “these are things one all of a sudden grasps.” Six weeks later, talking of Nature’s cruelty, he said it went on “until the appearance of the Saviour on the cross,” and added, “in the urge to put an end to the whole of Nature’s will to live.”
Nietzsche. The diaries hold the whole arc of the friendship. Nietzsche arrives in 1869 as a brilliant young professor who “knows R.’s works thoroughly,” spends holidays at Tribschen, writes The Birth of Tragedy under Wagner’s spell and stands beside him at the foundation stone. Cosima noticed early “a dubious streak” in him. The last meetings were at Sorrento in 1876. When Human, All Too Human arrived in April 1878, Wagner resolved not to read it, and by 1879 Cosima wrote that Nietzsche had “committed the one sin which cannot be atoned for, the sin against the Holy Ghost.” In later years Wagner spoke of him with contempt and some sorrow, as a promising mind that the modern world had ruined, while Cosima admitted that she could still remember only his friendly side.
Antisemitism. Hostile remarks about Jews by both Wagner and Cosima recur from the first year to the last, aimed at the press, critics, money, Meyerbeer and the modern theatre. In 1873 Wagner opposed intermarriage in racial terms, and the remarks grow harsher from 1879, when the antisemitic movement gathered in Berlin. That October, reading a speech by Adolf Stoecker, he was “in favor of expelling them entirely.” In December 1881, after the Ringtheater fire in Vienna, Cosima records him making “a drastic joke to the effect that all Jews should be burned at a performance of Nathan der Weise.” From 1881 Gobineau’s racial theories enter the conversation, though Wagner usually set Christianity against them; in June 1881 he was “downright explosive in favor of Christian theories in contrast to racial ones,” and that December he said that races were “done for, and all that can now make an impact is, as I have ventured to express it, the blood of Christ.” He also refused to sign the 1880 petition to Bismarck against the Jews, declined to let the Bayreuther Blätter join the agitation, and complained that nobody had noticed what Know Thyself said about “our own blame for our situation.”
The same diaries show Wagner depending on Jewish colleagues, above all Joseph Rubinstein, Angelo Neumann and Hermann Levi, and they show how that dependence was poisoned. In 1880 Wagner said he could not let Levi conduct Parsifal “unbaptized,” and in 1881 he told him he hoped to find “a formula which will make you feel completely one of us.” When an anonymous letter that summer made Levi ask to be released, Wagner wrote persuading him to return, and Levi conducted every performance in 1882 and was with the family in Venice in February 1883. One of the last entries records Wagner saying that “the Jews, the good ones,” were “condemned to a gently resigned asceticism.”
Because the diaries run to thousands of entries, the table below is a finding aid rather than a summary. Choose a year and month to browse, or search the entries, then open a day to read it in full.
| Date | Word Count | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| November 1, 1880 | 124 | A good night is followed by practical fuss over lodging, but Frl. Schmidt’s kindness persuades us to remain where we are, and the King sends flowers. In the evening Beethoven’s Mass leaves a powerful but complex impression, prompting R. to distinguish between technical musicianship and the deeper point at which his real pleasure begins. |
| November 2, 1880 | 77 | Despite a bad, restless night, R. ventures out briefly until the harsh wind drives him back, though a photograph of the Sistine Madonna absorbs his thoughts. He thanks the King in verse for the flowers, and in the evening Joseph pleases and moves us both with what R. recognizes as true style. |
| November 3, 1880 | 199 | After sleeping well, R. reacts quickly to rumors of a Berlin Nibelungen production by sending word that he will not release his works there. He sits for Lenbach, hears troubling reports of the King’s fearful isolation, and later spends a lively evening with Levi, Busch, Lenbach, and Gedon that mixes laughter, artistic disagreement, and R.’s continuing fascination with Jacolliot and ideas of justice. |
| November 4, 1880 | 80 | R., cheerful after a good night, jokes that better heating would deserve a feast day more than the Annunciation, turning household discomfort into comedy. The day brings photography and further talks over Neumann’s Berlin plans, and in the evening Der fliegende Holländer moves him so deeply that he repeatedly breaks into tears despite the weak performance. |
| November 5, 1880 | 64 | R. starts the day by debating whether dependable singers or gifted ones are preferable, choosing correctness while I argue that real artistry cannot exist without talent. Bad weather keeps him indoors; the children and I go to The Merchant of Venice, while he retires early to bed. |
| November 6, 1880 | 88 | The morning was consumed by talk of The Merchant, which remained all-important despite a discouraging performance. After much indecision they went to Lenbach’s gathering and enjoyed it at first, but the night ended in Richard’s violent agitation and left her brooding over suffering and sin. |
| November 7, 1880 | 141 | Richard only slept toward dawn after a terrifying dream of Fidi in the water. The day stayed heavy: they revisited the previous evening, she was hurt when he said she stood between her children and herself, and a sorrow-laden Tristan that night moved him so deeply he felt himself to be every tragic figure onstage. |
| November 8, 1880 | 296 | Richard described bizarre dreams of a white horse, the Austrian Emperor, and a giant hand turning into Gedon’s, then reassured her with words that made her feel central to his life. Lunch was full of joking, but the evening turned tense when talk with Heckel and others about the Patrons’ Society deficit and money owed to the children provoked one of Richard’s angry outbursts before he finally softened. |
| November 9, 1880 | 154 | Though still exhausted, Richard sat first for Gedon’s bust and then for Lenbach, and the artistic work was enlivened by friendly teasing when Joukowsky was drawn into the painting session. Feustel joined them warmly for lunch, and the evening’s old comedy and Coppelia left them cool except for admiration for the mechanical dance and later talk about Schiller and Weber. |
| November 10, 1880 | 112 | Their morning discussion continued the previous night’s irritation with Coppelia, which they dismissed as shallow Parisian prettiness. A royal bouquet marked Lohengrin, and while the tragedy struck her strongly, Richard grumbled about the conducting and staging even as he took real pleasure in finding the King unchanged. |
| November 11, 1880 | 263 | After the late Lohengrin evening, Richard worked on the Parsifal program and spoke intensely about Elsa’s tragic fate and the opera’s lack of reconciliation. They visited the town hall and Lenbach again, then heard Die Zauberflote, which he praised as deeply German, and later she noted with satisfaction that he agreed with her views on how artistic institutions should recognize new work in its own time. |
| November 12, 1880 | 236 | She spent part of the day with R. Seitz discussing Parsifal costumes while Richard, annoyed by Jacolliot’s pretensions, went to a court theater rehearsal where the orchestra’s affection clearly pleased him. The King’s request for the Lohengrin Prelude vexed him, and back home Lenbach’s remarks about Bismarck set off another spell of anger that lingered into a troubled walk and a bleak exchange with Levi. |
| November 13, 1880 | 77 | A restless night gave way to a steadier day, and Richard recovered enough to delight in Staberl’s Abenteuer. He laughed freely, personally thanked the actor Lang, and admired the earthy bourgeois quality of the performance while reading Gobineau with interest. |
| November 14, 1880 | 282 | Sunshine and good sleep lifted Richard’s mood, and after writing to the King and walking with Joukowsky he joked about embracing Frau Vogl. A convivial gathering with performers was followed by a disappointing As You Like It, yet the moonlit walk home and their renewed admiration for Shakespeare’s language restored the evening to warmth and good spirits. |
| November 15, 1880 | 87 | Confined to his room with a cold, Richard had to miss Die Meistersinger and spent the day reading La Renaissance. A visit from Herr von Buerkel pleased him, but despite that and her favorable report from the performance, he remained downcast. |
| November 16, 1880 | 447 | R. recovered well enough to go out with me, and after a strained interval he reconciled warmly with Lenbach during a visit to the studio. He was cheerful at lunch, pleased by support from Herr von Ziegler, and later discussed music, painting, and Jewish influence at supper in a mood that ranged from combative to companionable. |
| November 17, 1880 | 153 | We traveled back to Bayreuth in lively spirits, joking through an unpleasant rail journey and receiving warm welcomes on arrival. Once at Wahnfried, the homecoming felt strangely unreal, and by evening R. grew irritable with visitors and talk of redecorating before finally settling down. |
| November 18, 1880 | 148 | After a good night, R. enjoyed a bright breakfast, a walk in the palace gardens with Marke, and the comfort of finding the household in order. Patronage matters and fresh donations moved him, but the local climate and obligations wore on his nerves until a quiet evening together restored him somewhat. |
| November 19, 1880 | 125 | R. read La Renaissance with growing absorption and spoke wistfully of Italy, contrasting its enchantment with the gray sadness of Bayreuth. He invited Jouk. to stay until his studio was ready, fretted over pointless correspondence, and was unexpectedly pleased when a biography of my father stirred affectionate thoughts that he teasingly called Bellagio. |
| November 20, 1880 | 60 | Though R. had slept well, the oppressive weather and a pain in his chest stopped him from going out and drove his thoughts back to Venice. He took solace instead in Count G.’s book, reading aloud scenes of death and artistic rivalry that continued to delight him. |
| November 21, 1880 | 271 | A restless night left us both unsettled, and R. spoke bleakly at breakfast of indifference, saying only the children still tied him to the world. Yet Gobineau’s Michelangelo deeply stirred him, prompting talk of temperament, collapse, and destiny before a vexing outing gave way to news of Pepino’s homesickness and a closing game of whist. |
| November 22, 1880 | 210 | R. woke well and passed from amused judgment on odd acquaintances to genuine outrage over the indiscreet biography of my father. I continued arranging the house to his satisfaction, we drank and joked against the bad weather, and at supper he reminisced playfully about our first Italian journey and his wish that we had never returned. |
| November 23, 1880 | 184 | R. again praised Gobineau and turned to his score under the same gray skies, dissatisfied until he worked through problems in the stage brass parts. The evening lightened when he read Der Bauer als Millionar to the children, reflected on the Reichstag debate with disgust, and ended in a cheerful fit of forgetfulness, calling up to me to stay pretty and merry. |
| November 24, 1880 | 181 | We walked with the children to the theater in pleasant weather, while R. railed against Frantz on Schelling and dismissed such philosophy as empty wind. After lunch he confessed how little the performance of his own works now meant to him, worried over Parsifal, and later entertained friends by reading an absurd proof of God before marking cuts in Tristan. |
| November 25, 1880 | 131 | R. was unable to work steadily, making mistakes, lapsing into absent-minded anxiety, and flying into fury over Voltz and Batz wanting 60,000 marks to return rights in his works. Later he reviewed the end of Götterdämmerung and declared he would never again write anything so intricate, then took comfort in old letters that showed his artistic convictions unchanged and in the cheerful presence of the children. |
| November 26, 1880 | 204 | R. was somewhat better after the night, working a little and taking a short walk before the chest pain returned. The Grosses brought comfort, and the evening moved through talk with Wolzogen about history as decline, migration to found new communities, and readings for the children and from old letters, all in a reflective, intimate mood. |
| November 27, 1880 | 46 | R. slept well and made progress at his work, though the bad weather left him depleted enough to stay indoors. The day remained quiet, ending with more letters to Uhlig read aloud in a subdued atmosphere. |
| November 28, 1880 | 210 | The day mixed personal warmth with business and theater politics, beginning happily when R. kindly received a small gift. He rejected Voltz and Batz’s price, opposed using the Berlin opera house in favor of the Viktoria Theater, welcomed good news about Seidl, and spent the evening in animated conversation with Rub. about larger cultural questions and the absurdities of courtly prestige. |
| November 29, 1880 | 273 | R. woke with a mild eye inflammation, but rest quickly improved him after a little coaxing. A drive, encouraging news from Stein, and renewed discussion with Wolzogen about ethics, decline, and the moral failures of history gave the day an earnest but productive tone. |
| November 30, 1880 | 445 | After a poor night, R. launched into harsh political talk about the Jewish question and the stock exchange before working and enduring the damp weather badly. A later walk together in the palace gardens turned grim observations into shared dark humor, and the evening shifted to old letters, worries about the future of the Blatter, and a solemn resolve that their private correspondence must never be published. |
| No diary entries found. | ||