Wagner's Letters

Richard Wagner to Franz Liszt

April 18, 1851 · Zurich

Overview

Acknowledging his authorship of the pseudonymous 'Judaism in Music', Wagner tells Liszt that his long-suppressed resentment was as necessary to him as gall to the blood. He explains that he finds Meyerbeer, whose patronage recalls the most dishonest period of his life, infinitely repugnant, and must proclaim him his total antithesis in order to be seen clearly.

Letter

[...] You ask me about “Judaism”. You know of course that the article is by me: so why do you ask? It was not out of fear, but to prevent the question from being dragged down by the Jews to a purely personal level that I appeared in print pseudonymously. I harboured a long suppressed resentment against this Jewish business, and this resentment is as necessary to my nature as gall is to the blood. The immediate cause of my intense annoyance was their damned scribblings, so that I finally let fly: I seem to have struck home with terrible force, which suits my purpose admirably, since that is precisely the sort of shock that I wanted to give them. For they will always remain our masters - that much is as certain as the fact that it is not our princes who are now our masters, but bankers and philistines. - Meyerbeer is a special case, as far as I am concerned: it is not that I hate him, but that I find him infinitely repugnant. This perpetually kind and obliging man reminds me of the darkest - I might almost say the most wicked - period of my life, when he still made a show of protecting me; it was a period of connections and back-staircases, when we were treated like fools by patrons whom we inwardly deeply despised. That is a relationship of the most utter dishonesty: neither party is sincere in its dealings with the other; each assumes an air of devotion, but they use each other only so long as it profits them to do so. I do not reproach Meierbeer in the least for the intentional ineffectiveness of his kindness towards me, - on the contrary, I am glad that I am not as deeply in his debt as is Berlioz, for ex. But it was time for me to break away completely from so dishonest a relationship: superficially, I did not have the least occasion for doing so, for even the discovery that he was playing me false could not surprise me or, indeed, justify my action, since it was basically I who had to reproach myself for having wilfully allowed myself to be deceived concerning him. No, it was for more deep-seated reasons that I felt the need to abandon all the usual considerations of common sense in my dealings with him: I cannot exist as an artist in my own eyes or in those of my friends, I cannot think or feel anything without sensing in Meyerbeer my total antithesis, a contrast I am driven loudly to proclaim by the genuine despair that I feel whenever I encounter, even among many of my friends, the mistaken view that I have something in common with Meyerbeer. With all that I want and feel, I cannot appear before any of these friends with the requisite pureness and clarity until such time as I distance myself completely from this vague image with which so many people still associate me. This is a necessary act if my mature self is to be fully born, - and - if God wills it - I think I shall have been of service to many another person in having performed this act with such zeal!

[...]

Source: Selected Letters of Richard Wagner, trans. and ed. Stewart Spencer and Barry Millington (W. W. Norton & Company, 1988), No. 120