Cosima's Diaries

Diary Entry of June 13, 1881

Overview

A productive morning of work gives way to an outing to the mayor's that is ambushed by a storm; sheltering beneath church portals, Wagner is swept back into anxious memories of the revolutionary years when the buffeting wind reminded him of police descending upon him. The evening deepens into intimate reflection — Wagner compares Cosima to Sieglinde and their bond to Tristan and Isolde, and the question of whether to one day destroy their correspondence draws a meditation on legacy, mortality, and how unlike the bloodless Goethe-Stein relationship their own passionate history has been. A melancholy undercurrent runs through the close of the day as news arrives of Hans's bitterness about London, stirring complicated emotions in both of them.

Content

Monday, June 13:

R. had a good night and works diligently. A ridiculous story read aloud by R. over coffee, in which Jews make a frequent appearance, brings from R. the remark, “Certainly much has been won in the last six months, since one mentions the Jews by name.”

In the afternoon R. and I visit the mayor and are overtaken by a storm; we seek refuge under the portals of the church, and R. complains about the wind, which reminds him of an officious policeman setting upon and grabbing him, a fear which used to haunt him during the revolutionary years.

After the visit to the mayor the wind has died down, and R. suggests going with me to Angermann’s. We carry out his suggestion and then stroll home, where we walk a little while longer in the garden. The wind has died down, but R.’s thoughts are full of the bad climate, and he speaks definitely of spending next winter away from here.

In the evening memories of Switzerland, the lovely days, but also the floods. R. compares me with Sieglinde: “Further, further!” When we are alone, we talk about our relationship. “Tristan and Isolde,” says R.

I ask him whether I should not destroy our correspondence, since we may perhaps die before Siegfried is sufficiently mature. R. says, “Not yet, but later perhaps; there is no trace of the Goethe-Stein relationship in it - there was blood everywhere.”

Previously, when we were speaking about our journey, he said he was glad it had been so agonizing for us, since things must have been agonizing for others, too.

Hans’s letter to Daniela also provides us with a melancholy topic; he is bitter about his stay in London, and this renewed relationship, though desired, also produces quivers and qualms.